The Glaciers of the Alps: Being a narrative of excursions and ascents, an account of the origin and phenomena of glaciers and an exposition of the physical principles to which they are relatedTyndall, John
Science
The Glaciers of the Alps: Being a narrative of excursions and ascents, an account of the origin and phenomena of glaciers and an exposition of the physical principles to which they are related
Tyndall, John
Alps -- Description and travel; Glaciers -- Alps
That a drag towards the centre of the glacier exists is undeniable, but
that in consequence of the drag there is a sliding of filaments in this
direction, is quite another thing. I have in another place[B]
endeavoured to show experimentally that no such sliding takes place,
that the drag on any point towards the centre expresses only half the
conditions of the problem; being exactly neutralized by the thrust
towards the sides. It has been, moreover, shown by Mr. Hopkins that the
lines of maximum strain and of maximum sliding cannot coincide; indeed,
if all the particles be urged by the same force, no matter how strong
the pull may be, there will be no tendency of one to slide past the
other.
FOOTNOTES:
[A] 'Philosophical Magazine,' Ser. III., vol. xxvi.
[B] 'Proceedings of the Royal Institution,' vol. ii. p. 324.
THE RIPPLE-THEORY OF THE VEINED STRUCTURE.
(29.)
[Sidenote: THEORY STATED.]
[Sidenote: THEORY EXAMINED.]
The assumption of oblique sliding, and the production thereby of the
marginal structure, have, however, been fortified by considerations of
an ingenious and very interesting kind. "How," I have asked, "can the
oblique structure persist across the lines of greatest differential
motion throughout the length of the glacier?" But here I am met by
another question which at first sight might seem equally
unanswerable--"How do ripple-marks on the surface of a flowing river,
which are nothing else than lines of differential motion of a low order,
cross the river from the sides obliquely, while the direction of
greatest differential motion is parallel to the sides?" If I understand
aright, this is the main argument of Professor Forbes in favour of his
theory of the oblique marginal structure. It is first introduced in a
note at page 378 of his 'Travels;' he alludes to it in a letter written
the following year; in his paper in the 'Philosophical Transactions' he
develops the theory. He there gives drawings of ripple-marks observed in
smooth gutters after rain, and which he finds to be inclined to the
course of the stream, exactly as the marginal structure is inclined to
the side of the glacier. The explanation also embraces the case of an
obstacle placed in the centre of a river. "A case," writes Professor
Forbes, "parallel to the last mentioned, where a fixed obstacle cleaves
a descending stream, and leaves its trace in a fan-shaped tail, is well
known in several glaciers, as in that at Ferpecle, and the Glacier de
Lys on the south side of Monte Rosa; particularly the last, where the
veined structure follows the law just mentioned." In his Twelfth Letter
he also refers to the ripples "as exactly corresponding to the position
of the icy bands." In his letter to Dr. Whewell, published in the
'Occasional Papers,' page 58, he writes as follows:--"The same is
remarkably shown in the case of a stream of water, for instance a
mill-race. Although the movement of the water, as shown by floating
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account