What are the two covenants?—The two women, Hagar and Sarah; for we read
that Hagar is Mount Sinai, “which gendereth to bondage.” That is, just
as Hagar could not bring forth any other kind of children than slaves,
so the law, even the law that God spoke from Sinai, can not beget
freemen. It can do nothing but hold them in bondage. “The law worketh
wrath;” “for by the law is the knowledge of sin.” The same is true of
the covenant from Sinai, for it consisted merely of the promise of the
people to keep that law, and had, therefore, no more power to make them
free than the law itself had,—no more power than they already had in
their bondage. Nay, rather, it “gendered to bondage,” since their making
it was simply a promise to make themselves righteous by their own works,
and man in himself is “without strength.”
Consider the situation: The people were in the bondage of sin; they had
no power to break their chains; but the speaking of the law made no
change in their condition; it introduced no new feature. If a man is in
prison for crime, you can not release him by reading the statutes to
him. It was the law that put him there, and the reading of it to him
only makes his captivity more painful.
“Then did not God Himself lead them into bondage?”—Not by any means;
since He did not induce them to make that covenant at Sinai. Four
hundred and thirty years before that time He had made a covenant with
Abraham, which was sufficient for all purposes. That covenant was
confirmed in Christ, and, therefore, was a covenant from above. See John
8:23. It promised righteousness as a free gift of God through faith, and
it included all nations. All the miracles that God had wrought in
delivering the children of Israel from Egyptian bondage were but
demonstrations of His power to deliver them and us from the bondage of
sin. Yes, the deliverance from Egypt was itself a demonstration not only
of God’s power, but also of His desire to lead them from the bondage of
sin, that bondage in which the covenant from Sinai holds men, because
Hagar, who is the covenant from Sinai, was an Egyptian. So when the
people came to Sinai, God simply referred them to what He had already
done, and then said, “Now therefore, if ye will obey My voice indeed,
and keep My covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto Me above
all people; for all the earth is Mine.” Ex. 19:5. To what covenant did
He refer?—Evidently to the one already in existence, His covenant with
Abraham. If they would simply keep God’s covenant, that is, God’s
promise,—keep the faith,—they would be a peculiar treasure unto God, for
God, as the possessor of all the earth, was able to do with them all
that He had promised. The fact that they in their self-sufficiency
rashly took the whole responsibility upon themselves, does not prove
that God led them into making that covenant, but the contrary. He was
leading them out of bondage, not into it, and the apostle plainly tells
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account