The glory of the PharaohsWeigall, Arthur E. P. Brome (Arthur Edward Pearse Brome)
History
The glory of the Pharaohs
Weigall, Arthur E. P. Brome (Arthur Edward Pearse Brome)
Egypt -- Antiquities
It seems reasonable to hold that the mummies of Pharaohs and other
historical characters should be available for study at any moment, and
should not be buried again beneath the tons of sand and rock from which
they have been removed. But most assuredly they should be placed with
decency and solemnity in a room set aside for the purpose in the Cairo
Museum, and should only be seen by special permission. Certain
exceptions might be made to this rule. The mummies of Rameses the
Second, Sethos the First, Thutmosis the Fourth, Prince Yuaa, Princess
Tuau, and one or two others have such inherent dignity that, in rather
more serious and impressive surroundings, they might well remain on
regular exhibition in Cairo. It is a pity that they cannot be placed
once more in their tombs at Thebes, where they might be visited, as is
the tomb and mummy of Amenophis the Second among the hills of the
western desert. But there is too grave a danger from the native
plunderer, who, in spite of bolts, bars, and police, on one occasion
burst into the tomb of this Amenophis and bashed in the breast of the
mummy in the vain search for gold. At present there are seven watchmen
in the Valley of the Tombs of the Kings, and it would be quite absurd to
replace more of the royal mummies there with such inadequate protection.
The tomb of Rameses the Second, moreover, is now destroyed, and the
alabaster sarcophagus of Sethos the First is in London; thus neither of
these two mummies could be properly enshrined.
The public exhibition of the mummies of the ancient Egyptians in the
galleries of the museums of the world, where they are generally stuffed
into glass
[Illustration: The mummy of Prince Yuaa. The photograph was taken by the
Author on the day of its discovery. The mummy is now in the Cairo
Museum.]
cases amidst dusty collections of pots and pans and sticks and stones,
is always objectionable. One does not care to think of the body of a
Pharaoh who ruled a mighty empire exposed to the giggling comments of
the members of a school treat, or to the hard jests of the American
tourist. The only three justifications for the removal of the body from
the tomb are that it could not safely be left in its sepulchre, that it
is of use to scientists, and that it is of value in the education of the
public. Now, the first two of these points do not give reason for its
exhibition at all, and the third obviously requires the “setting” to be
impressive and conducive to serious and undistracted thought. We are not
called upon to amuse the public by means of the earthly remains of a
great king: we may leave the business of entertainment to the circus
proprietor.
The fact that excavation so often involves the disturbance of the dead
makes it a very serious matter, not to be entered into in any but a
purely scientific spirit. But there are also other reasons for regarding
excavation as in no way a sport.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account