Success responded amply to our zeal. We found a goodly number of
pseudochrysalids. More often still, we unearthed larvae which were
busy eating the Mantes, the rations of the Tachytes. Are these really
the larvae that turn into the pseudochrysalids? It seems very
probable, but there is room for doubt. Rearing them at home will
dispel the mists of probability and replace them by the light of
certainty. But that is all: I have not a vestige of the perfect insect
to inform me of the nature of the parasite. The future, let us hope,
will fill this gap. Such was the result of the first trench opened in
the heap of sand. Later searches enriched my harvest a little, without
furnishing me with fresh data.
Let us now proceed to examine my double find. And first of all the
pseudochrysalis, which put me on the alert. It is a motionless, rigid
body, of a waxen yellow, smooth, shiny, curved like a fish-hook
towards the head, which is inflected. Under a very powerful
magnifying-glass the surface is seen to be strewn with very tiny
points which are slightly raised and shinier than the surface. There
are thirteen segments, including the head. The dorsal surface is
convex, the ventral surface flat. A blunt ridge divides the two
surfaces. The three thoracic segments bear each a pair of tiny conical
nipples, of a deep rusty red, signs of the future legs. The stigmata
are very distinct, appearing as specks of a deeper red than the rest
of the integuments. There is one pair, the largest, on the second
segment of the thorax, almost on the line dividing it from the first
segment. Then follow eight pairs, one on each segment of the abdomen
except the last, making in all nine pairs of stigmata. The last pair,
that of the eighth abdominal segment, is the smallest.
The anal extremity displays no peculiarity. The cephalic mask
comprises eight cone-shaped tubercles, dark red like the tubercles of
the legs. Six of these are arranged in two lateral rows; the others
are between the two rows. In each row of three nipples, the one in the
middle is the largest; it no doubt corresponds with the mandibles. The
length of this organism varies greatly, fluctuating between 8 and 15
millimetres.[1] Its width is from 3 to 4 millimetres.[2]
[Footnote 1: .312 to .585 inch.--_Translator's Note_.]
[Footnote 2: .117 to .156 inch.--_Translator's Note_.]
Apart from the general configuration, it will be seen that we have
here the strikingly characteristic appearance of the pseudochrysalids
of the Sitares, Oil-beetles and Zonites. There are the same rigid
integuments, of the red of a cough-lozenge or virgin wax; the same
cephalic mask, in which the future mouth-parts are represented by
faintly marked tubercles; the same thoracic studs, which are the
vestiges of the legs; the same distribution of the stigmata. I was
therefore firmly convinced that the parasite of the Mantis-hunters
could only be a Meloid.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account