The Golden Bough: A Study in Comparative Religion (Vol. 1 of 2)Frazer, James George
Religion
The Golden Bough: A Study in Comparative Religion (Vol. 1 of 2)
Frazer, James George
Magic; Mythology; Religion; Superstition
(3.) Spirits, not gods, are recognised. (_a._) As distinguished from gods,
spirits are restricted in their operations to definite departments of
nature. Their names are general, not proper. Their attributes are generic,
rather than individual; in other words, there is an indefinite number of
spirits of each class, and the individuals of a class are all much alike;
they have no definitely marked individuality; no accepted traditions are
current as to their origin, life, adventures, and character. (_b._) On the
other hand gods, as distinguished from spirits, are not exclusively
restricted in their operations to definite departments of nature. It is
true that there is generally some one department over which they preside
as their special province; but they are not rigorously confined to it;
they can exert their power for good or evil in many other spheres of
nature and life. Again, they bear individual or proper names, such as
Ceres, Proserpine, Bacchus; and their individual characters and histories
are fixed by current myths and the representations of art.
(4.) The rites are magical rather than propitiatory. In other words, the
desired objects are attained, not by propitiating the favour of divine
beings through sacrifice, prayer, and praise, but by ceremonies which, as
has been explained,(1172) are believed to influence the course of nature
directly through a physical sympathy or resemblance between the rite and
the effect which it is the intention of the rite to produce.
Judged by these tests, the spring and harvest customs of our European
peasantry deserve to rank as primitive. For no special class of persons
and no special places are set exclusively apart for their performance;
they may be performed by any one, master or man, mistress or maid, boy or
girl; they are practised, not in temples or churches, but in the woods and
meadows, beside brooks, in barns, on harvest fields and cottage floors.
The supernatural beings whose existence is taken for granted in them are
spirits rather than deities; their functions are limited to certain
well-defined departments of nature; their names are general, like the
Barley-mother, the Old Woman, the Maiden, not proper names like Ceres,
Proserpine, Bacchus. Their generic attributes are known, but their
individual histories and characters are not the subject of myths. For they
exist in classes rather than as individuals, and the members of each class
are indistinguishable. For example, every farm has its Corn-mother, or its
Old Woman, or its Maiden; but every Corn-mother is much like every other
Corn-mother, and so with the Old Women and Maidens. Lastly, in these
harvest, as in the spring, customs, the ritual is magical rather than
propitiatory. This is shown by throwing the Corn-mother into the river in
order to secure rain and dew for the crops;(1173) by making the Old Woman
heavy in order to get a heavy crop next year;(1174) by strewing grain from
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account