The Golden Bough: A Study in Comparative Religion (Vol. 1 of 2)Frazer, James George
Religion
The Golden Bough: A Study in Comparative Religion (Vol. 1 of 2)
Frazer, James George
Magic; Mythology; Religion; Superstition
Thus the person who was killed on the harvest-field as the representative
of the corn-spirit may have been either a passing stranger or the
harvester who was last at reaping, binding, or threshing. But there is a
third possibility, to which ancient legend and modern folk-custom alike
point. Lityerses not only put strangers to death; he was himself slain,
and probably in the same way as he had slain others, namely, by being
wrapt in a corn-sheaf, beheaded, and cast into the river; and it is
implied that this happened to Lityerses on his own land. Similarly in
modern harvest-customs the pretence of killing appears to be carried out
quite as often on the person of the master (farmer or squire) as on that
of strangers.(1301) Now when we remember that Lityerses was said to have
been the son of the King of Phrygia, and combine with this the tradition
that he was put to death, apparently as a representative of the
corn-spirit, we are led to conjecture that we have here another trace of
the custom of annually slaying one of those divine or priestly kings who
are known to have held ghostly sway in many parts of Western Asia and
particularly in Phrygia. The custom appears, as we have seen,(1302) to
have been so far modified in places that the king’s son was slain in the
king’s stead. Of the custom thus modified the story of Lityerses would
therefore be a reminiscence.
Turning now to the relation of the Phrygian Lityerses to the Phrygian
Attis, it may be remembered that at Pessinus—the seat of a priestly
kingship—the high-priest appears to have been annually slain in the
character of Attis, a god of vegetation, and that Attis was described by
an ancient authority as “a reaped ear of corn.”(1303) Thus Attis, as an
embodiment of the corn-spirit, annually slain in the person of his
representative, might be thought to be ultimately identical with
Lityerses, the latter being simply the rustic prototype out of which the
state religion of Attis was developed. It may have been so; but, on the
other hand, the analogy of European folk-custom warns us that amongst the
same people two distinct deities of vegetation may have their separate
personal representatives, both of whom are slain in the character of gods
at different times of the year. For in Europe, as we have seen, it appears
that one man was commonly slain in the character of the tree-spirit in
spring, and another in the character of the corn-spirit in autumn. It may
have been so in Phrygia also. Attis was especially a tree-god, and his
connection with corn may have been only such an extension of the power of
a tree-spirit as is indicated in customs like the Harvest-May.(1304)
Again, the representative of Attis appears to have been slain in spring;
whereas Lityerses must have been slain in summer or autumn, according to
the time of the harvest in Phrygia.(1305) On the whole, then, while we are
not justified in regarding Lityerses as the prototype of Attis, the two
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account