The Golden Bough: A Study in Comparative Religion (Vol. 2 of 2)Frazer, James George
ReligionComparative
The Golden Bough: A Study in Comparative Religion (Vol. 2 of 2)
Frazer, James George
Magic; Mythology; Religion; Superstition
From the Lover’s Leap, a white bluff at the southern end of their island,
the Leucadians used annually to hurl a criminal into the sea as a
scapegoat. But to lighten his fall they fastened live birds and feathers
to him, and a flotilla of small boats waited below to catch him and convey
him beyond the boundary.(580) Doubtless these humane precautions were a
mitigation of an earlier custom of flinging the scapegoat into the sea to
drown. The custom of the scapegoat as practised by the Greeks of Asia
Minor in the sixth century B.C. was as follows. When a city suffered from
plague, famine, or other public calamity, an ugly or deformed person was
chosen to take upon himself all the evils by which the city was afflicted.
He was brought to a suitable place where dried figs, a barley loaf, and
cheese were put into his hand. These he ate. Then he was beaten seven
times upon his genital organs with squills and branches of the wild fig
and other wild trees. Afterwards he was burned on a pyre constructed of
the wood of forest trees; and his ashes were cast into the sea.(581) A
similar custom appears to have been annually celebrated by the Asiatic
Greeks at the harvest festival of the Thargelia.(582)
In the ritual just described the beating of the victim with squills,
branches of the wild fig, etc., cannot have been intended to aggravate his
sufferings, otherwise any stick would have been good enough to beat him
with. The true meaning of this part of the ceremony has been explained by
W. Mannhardt.(583) He points out that the ancients attributed to squills a
magical power of averting evil influences, and accordingly hung them up at
the doors of their houses and made use of them in purificatory rites.(584)
Hence the Arcadian custom of beating the image of Pan with squills at a
festival or whenever the hunters returned empty-handed,(585) must have
been meant, not to punish the god, but to purify him from the harmful
influences which were impeding him in the exercise of his divine functions
as a god who should supply the hunter with game. Similarly the object of
beating the human scapegoat on the genital organs with squills, etc., must
have been to release his reproductive energies from any restraint or spell
under which they might be laid by demoniacal or other malignant agency;
and as the Thargelia at which he was annually sacrificed was an early
harvest festival,(586) we must recognise in him a representative of the
creative and fertilising god of vegetation. The representative of the god
was annually slain for the purpose I have indicated, that of maintaining
the divine life in perpetual vigour, untainted by the weakness of age; and
before he was put to death it was not unnatural to stimulate his
reproductive powers in order that these might be transmitted in full
activity to his successor, the new god or new embodiment of the old god,
who was doubtless supposed immediately to take the place of the one
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account