The Golden Bough: A Study in Comparative Religion (Vol. 2 of 2)Frazer, James George
ReligionComparative
The Golden Bough: A Study in Comparative Religion (Vol. 2 of 2)
Frazer, James George
Magic; Mythology; Religion; Superstition
all the blows of their knives and axes would glance harmless from its
surface. But once tear from the oak its sacred heart—the mistletoe—and the
tree nodded to its fall. And when in later times the spirit of the oak
came to be represented by a living man, it was logically necessary to
suppose that, like the tree he personated, he could neither be killed nor
wounded so long as the mistletoe remained uninjured. The pulling of the
mistletoe was thus at once the signal and the cause of his death.
But since the idea of a being whose life is thus, in a sense, outside
itself, must be strange to many readers, and has, indeed, not yet been
recognised in its full bearing on primitive superstition, it will be worth
while to devote a couple of sections to the subject. The result will be to
show that, in assuming this idea as the explanation of the relation of
Balder to the mistletoe, I assume a principle which is deeply engraved on
the mind of primitive man.
§ 3.—The external soul in folk-tales.
In a former chapter we saw that, in the opinion of primitive people, the
soul may temporarily absent itself from the body without causing death.
Such temporary absences of the soul are often believed to involve
considerable risk, since the wandering soul is liable to a variety of
mishaps at the hands of enemies, and so forth. But there is another aspect
to this power of externalising the soul. If only the safety of the soul
can be ensured during its absence from the body, there is no reason why
the soul should not continue absent for an indefinite time; indeed a man
may, on a pure calculation of personal safety, desire that his soul should
never return to his body. Unable to conceive of life abstractly as a
“permanent possibility of sensation” or a “continuous adjustment of
internal arrangements to external relations,” the savage thinks of it as a
concrete material thing of a definite bulk, capable of being seen and
handled, kept in a box or jar, and liable to be bruised, fractured, or
smashed in pieces. It is not needful that the life, so conceived, should
be in the man; it may be absent from his body and still continue to
animate him, by virtue of a sort of sympathy or “action at a distance.” So
long as this object which he calls his life or soul remains unharmed, the
man is well; if it is injured, he suffers; if it is destroyed, he dies.
Or, to put it otherwise, when a man is ill or dies, the fact is explained
by saying that the material object called his life or soul, whether it be
in his body or out of it, has either sustained injury or been destroyed.
But there may be circumstances in which, if the life or soul remains in
the man, it stands a greater chance of sustaining injury than if it were
stowed away in some safe and secret place. Accordingly, in such
circumstances, primitive man takes his soul out of his body and deposits
it for security in some safe place, intending to replace it in his body
when the danger is past.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account