The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (Third Edition, Vol. 01 of 12)Frazer, James George
Religion
The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (Third Edition, Vol. 01 of 12)
Frazer, James George
Magic; Mythology; Religion; Superstition
Thus on the theory of homoeopathic magic a person can influence
vegetation either for good or for evil according to the good or the bad
character of his acts or states: for example, a fruitful woman makes
plants fruitful, a barren woman makes them barren. Hence this belief
in the noxious and infectious nature of certain personal qualities or
accidents {p143} has given rise to a number of prohibitions or rules
of avoidance: people abstain from doing certain things lest they
should homoeopathically infect the fruits of the earth with their
own undesirable state or condition. All such customs of abstention
or rules of avoidance are examples of negative magic or taboo.[494]
Thus, for example, arguing from what may be called the infectiousness
of personal acts or states, the Galelareese say that you ought not to
shoot with a bow and arrows under a fruit-tree, or the tree will cast
its fruit even as the arrows fall to the ground;[495] and that when
you are eating water-melon you ought not to mix the pips which you
spit out of your mouth with the pips which you have put aside to serve
as seed; for if you do, though the pips you spat out may certainly
spring up and blossom, yet the blossoms will keep falling off just as
the pips fell from your mouth, and thus these pips will never bear
fruit.[496] Precisely the same train of thought leads the Bavarian
peasant to believe that if he allows the graft of a fruit-tree to fall
on the ground, the tree that springs from that graft will let its
fruit fall untimely.[497] The Indians of Santiago Tepehuacan suppose
that if a single grain of the maize which they are about to sow were
eaten by an animal, the birds and the wild boars would come and devour
all the rest, and nothing would grow. And if any of these Indians has
ever in his life buried a corpse, he will never be allowed to plant
a fruit-tree, for they say that the tree would wither. And they will
not let such a man go fishing with them, for the fish would flee from
him.[498] Clearly these Indians imagine that anybody who has buried
a corpse is thereby tainted, so to say, with an infection of death,
which might prove fatal to fruits and fish. In Nias, the day after a
man has made preparations for planting rice he may not use fire, or the
crop would be parched; he may not spread his mats on the ground, or the
young plants would droop towards the earth.[499] {p144} When the Chams
of Cochinchina are sowing their dry rice-fields and desire that no
rain should fall, they eat their rice dry instead of moistening it, as
they usually do, with the water in which vegetables and fish have been
boiled. That prevents rain from spoiling the rice.[500]
[Sidenote: Persons influenced homoeopathically by plants.
People supposed to be influenced homoeopathically by the nature of the
timber of which their houses are built.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account