The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (Third Edition, Vol. 01 of 12)Frazer, James George
Religion
The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (Third Edition, Vol. 01 of 12)
Frazer, James George
Magic; Mythology; Religion; Superstition
Yet though magic is thus found to fuse and amalgamate with religion
in many ages and in many lands, there are some grounds for thinking
that this fusion is not primitive, and that there was a time when
man trusted to magic alone for the satisfaction of such wants as
transcended his immediate animal cravings. In the first place a
consideration of the fundamental notions of magic and religion may
incline us to surmise that magic is older than religion in the history
of humanity. We have seen that on the one hand magic is nothing but
a mistaken application of the very simplest and most elementary
processes of the mind, namely the association of ideas by virtue of
resemblance or contiguity; and that on the other hand religion assumes
the operation of conscious or personal agents, superior to man, behind
the visible screen of nature. Obviously the conception of personal
agents is more complex than a simple recognition of the similarity
or contiguity of ideas; and a theory which assumes that the course
of nature is determined by conscious {p234} agents is more abstruse
and recondite, and requires for its apprehension a far higher degree
of intelligence and reflection, than the view that things succeed
each other simply by reason of their contiguity or resemblance. The
very beasts associate the ideas of things that are like each other
or that have been found together in their experience; and they could
hardly survive for a day if they ceased to do so. But who attributes
to the animals a belief that the phenomena of nature are worked by a
multitude of invisible animals or by one enormous and prodigiously
strong animal behind the scenes? It is probably no injustice to the
brutes to assume that the honour of devising a theory of this latter
sort must be reserved for human reason. Thus, if magic be deduced
immediately from elementary processes of reasoning, and be, in fact, an
error into which the mind falls almost spontaneously, while religion
rests on conceptions which the merely animal intelligence can hardly be
supposed to have yet attained to, it becomes probable that magic arose
before religion in the evolution of our race, and that man essayed to
bend nature to his wishes by the sheer force of spells and enchantments
before he strove to coax and mollify a coy, capricious, or irascible
deity by the soft insinuation of prayer and sacrifice.
[Sidenote: Among the Australian aborigines magic is universal, but
religion almost unknown.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account