The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (Third Edition, Vol. 01 of 12)Frazer, James George
Religion
The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (Third Edition, Vol. 01 of 12)
Frazer, James George
Magic; Mythology; Religion; Superstition
Now too we can fully understand the meaning of the bloody ritual in the
ceremonies for the multiplication of the totem animals and plants. We
have seen that a strengthening and fertilising virtue is attributed to
human blood. What {p106} more natural than that it should be poured out
by the men of the totem on the spot in which the disembodied spirits
of the totem animals or plants are waiting for reincarnation? Clearly
the rite seems intended to enable these spirits to take bodily shape
and be born again, in order that they may again serve as food, if not
to the men of the totem clan, at least to all the other numbers of the
tribe. Later on we shall find that the attempt to reincarnate the souls
of dead animals, in order that their bodies may be eaten over again,
is not peculiar to the Australian savages, but is practised with many
curious rites by peoples in other parts of the world.
[Sidenote: General theory of _intichiuma_ and initiatory rites in
Australia.
Cannibalism in Australia.
Australian totemism not a religion.
Present function of totemism in Central Australia.]
To sum up briefly the general theory to which the foregoing facts have
thus far led us, I would say that just as the _intichiuma_ rites of
the Australians are, for the most part, magical ceremonies intended to
secure the reimbodiment of the spirits of edible animals and plants, so
their initiatory rites may perhaps be regarded as magical ceremonies
designed mainly to ensure the reincarnation of human souls. Now the
motive for procuring the rebirth of animals and plants is simply the
desire to eat them. May not this have been one motive for attempting
to resuscitate the human dead? It would seem so, for all the tribes on
the Gulf of Carpentaria who have been examined by Spencer and Gillen
eat their dead,[360] and the ceremonies and traditions of the Arunta
indicate that their ancestors also ate the bodies of their fellow
tribesmen.[361] In this respect the practice of the Binbinga tribe
is particularly instructive. For among them the bodies of the dead
are cut up and eaten, not by men of the same tribal subclass as the
deceased, but by men belonging to the subclasses which compose the
other intermarrying half of the tribe.[362] This is exactly analogous
to the practice which at present prevails as to the eating of the totem
animal or plant among all these central and northern tribes. Among them
each clan that has an edible animal or plant for its totem is supposed
to provide that animal or {p107} plant for all the other clans to eat;
and similarly among the Binbinga the men of any particular subclass
do actually provide their own bodies for the members of the other
intermarrying half of the tribe to devour. And just as in the far past
the members of a totem clan appear to have subsisted regularly (though
not exclusively, and perhaps not even mainly) on their totem animal
or plant,[363] so at a remote time they seem regularly to have eaten
each other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account