409 W. J. Hamilton, _Researches in Asia Minor, Pontus, and Armenia_ (London, 1842), i. 393-395; H. F. Tozer, _Turkish Armenia and Eastern Asia Minor_, pp. 59 _sq._, 66-78; W. M. Ramsay, “Historical Relations of Phrygia and Asia Minor,” _Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society_, N.S. xv. (1883) pp. 113-120; G. Perrot et Ch. Chipiez, _Histoire de l’Art dans l’Antiquité_, iv. 623-656, 666-672; K. Humann und O. Puchstein, _Reisen in Kleinasien und Nordsyrien_, pp. 55-70, with Atlas, plates vii.-x.; E. Chantre, _Mission en Cappadoce_, pp. 3-5, 16-26; L. Messerschmidt, _The Hittites_, pp. 42-50; Th. Macridy-Bey, _La Porte des Sphinx à Eyuk_, pp. 13 _sq._ (_Mitteilungen der Vorderasiatischen Gesellschaft_, 1908, No. 3, Berlin); Ed. Meyer, _Geschichte des Altertums_,2 i. 2. pp. 631 _sq._; J. Garstang, _The Land of the Hittites_ (London, 1910), pp. 196 _sqq._ (Boghaz-Keui) 256 _sqq._ (Eyuk). Compare P. Jensen, _Hittiter und Armenier_, pp. 165 _sqq._ In some notes with which my colleague Professor J. Garstang has kindly furnished me he tells me that the two animals wearing Hittite hats, which appear between the great god and goddess in the outer sanctuary, are not bulls but certainly goats; and he inclines to think that the two heaps on which the priest stands in the outer sanctuary are fir-cones. Professor Ed. Meyer holds that the costume which the priestly king wears is that of the Sun-goddess, and that the corresponding figure in the procession of males on the left-hand side of the outer sanctuary does not represent the priestly king but the Sun-goddess in person. “The attributes of the King,” he says (_op. cit._ p. 632), “are to be explained by the circumstance that he, as the Hittite inscriptions prove, passed for an incarnation of the Sun, who with the Hittites was a female divinity; the temple of the Sun is therefore his emblem.” As to the title of “the Sun” bestowed on Hittite kings in inscriptions, see H. Winckler, “Vorläufige Nachrichten über die Ausgrabungen in Boghaz-köi im Sommer 1907,” _Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft zu Berlin_, No. 35, December 1907, pp. 32, 33, 36, 44, 45, 53. The correct form of the national name appears to be Chatti or Hatti rather than Hittites, which is the Hebrew form (חתי) of the name. Compare M. Jastrow, in _Encyclopaedia Biblica_, ii. coll. 2094 _sqq._, _s.v._ “Hittites.”