The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (Third Edition, Vol. 08 of 12)Frazer, James George
Religion
The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (Third Edition, Vol. 08 of 12)
Frazer, James George
Magic; Mythology; Religion; Superstition
which they eat, and to throw them into a stream, bury them in the depths
of the forest, or burn them in the fire, “in order that the animals of the
sort killed may not be angry and may allow themselves to be killed
again.”(746) In sacrificing an animal the Lapps regularly put aside the
bones, eyes, ears, heart, lungs, sexual parts (if the animal was a male),
and a morsel of flesh from each limb. Then, after eating the remainder of
the flesh, they laid the bones and the rest in anatomical order in a
coffin and buried them with the usual rites, believing that the god to
whom the animal was sacrificed would reclothe the bones with flesh and
restore the animal to life in Jabme-Aimo, the subterranean world of the
dead. Sometimes, as after feasting on a bear, they seem to have contented
themselves with thus burying the bones.(747) Thus the Lapps expected the
resurrection of the slain animal to take place in another world,
resembling in this respect the Kamtchatkans, who believed that every
creature, down to the smallest fly, would rise from the dead and live
underground.(748) On the other hand, the North American Indians looked for
the resurrection of the animals in the present world. The habit, observed
especially by Mongolian peoples, of stuffing the skin of a sacrificed
animal, or stretching it on a framework,(749) points rather to a belief in
a resurrection of the latter sort. The objection commonly entertained by
primitive peoples to break the bones of the animals which they have eaten
or sacrificed(750) may be based either on a belief in the resurrection of
the animals, or on a fear of intimidating other creatures of the same
species and offending the ghosts of the slain animals. The reluctance of
North American Indians and Esquimaux to let dogs gnaw the bones of
animals(751) is perhaps only a precaution to prevent the bones from being
broken.
(M191) We have already seen that some rude races believe in a resurrection
of men(752) as well as of beasts, and it is quite natural that people who
entertain such a belief should take care of the bones of their dead in
order that the original owners of the bones may have them to hand at the
critical moment. Hence in the Mexican territories of Guazacualco and
Yluta, where the Indians thought that the dead would rise again, the bones
of the departed were deposited in baskets and hung up on trees, that their
spirits might not be obliged to grub in the earth for them at the
resurrection.(753) On the other hand, the Luritcha tribe of Central
Australia, who eat their enemies, take steps to prevent their coming to
life again, which might prove very inconvenient, by destroying the bones
and especially the skulls of the bodies on which they have banqueted.(754)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account