The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (Third Edition, Vol. 08 of 12)Frazer, James George
Religion
The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (Third Edition, Vol. 08 of 12)
Frazer, James George
Magic; Mythology; Religion; Superstition
(M201) The conjecture that the practice of cutting out the tongues of dead
animals may sometimes be a precaution to prevent their ghosts from telling
tales, is to some extent confirmed by a ceremony which the Bechuanas used
to observe after a battle. It was customary with them on these occasions
to sacrifice a fine black ox, called the expiatory victim (_pekou_), cut
off the tip of its tongue, and extract one of its eyes together with a
piece of the hamstring and a piece of the principal tendon of the
shoulder; and the severed parts were afterwards carefully fried, along
with some medicinal herbs, in a horn by a medicine-man. The reasons for
thus mutilating the animal were explained by a native to two French
missionaries. “If we cut out and purify the victim’s tongue,” said he,
“the motive is to induce the guardian deities to prevent the enemy from
speaking ill of us. We ask also that the sinews of their feet and hands
may fail them in the battle; and that their eyes may not cast a covetous
look on our herds.”(792) In this custom the sacrificial ox appears to be
treated as the ceremonial equivalent of the enemy; accordingly by cutting
out its tongue you obviously prevent your enemy from cursing you, for how
can he curse you if he has no tongue? Similarly, by hamstringing the beast
you ensure that the legs and arms of your adversary will fail him in the
battle, and by gouging out the ox’s eye you make perfectly certain that
the foe will never be able to cast a longing eye on your fat beeves. Thus
for all practical purposes the mutilation of the ox is quite as effective
as the mutilation of the enemy’s dead, which is sometimes practised by
savages from similar superstitious motives. Thus on the return from a
field of battle the Baganda used to cut up one or two of the enemy’s dead,
scoop out the eyes, cut off the ears, and lay the limbs on the road taken
by the returning army “to prevent evil following them.”(793) The nature of
the evil which the Baganda warriors feared to incur if they did not
mutilate the dead in this fashion, is not mentioned, but we may conjecture
that by gouging out the eyes and ears of their slain foes they hoped to
make their angry ghosts blind and deaf; or perhaps, upon the principles of
homoeopathic magic, they counted on maiming their living foes in like
manner. Some of the aborigines of Australia cut off the thumbs of their
dead enemies in order that their ghosts may not be able to throw
spears.(794) Other Australian tribes burn off the thumb nails of their own
dead to prevent the poor ghost from scratching a way for himself out of
the grave.(795) When the Tupi Indians of Brazil killed and ate a prisoner,
“the thumb was cut off because of its use in archery, an art concerning
which they were singularly superstitious; what was done with it does not
appear, except that it was not eaten like the rest.”(796) Perhaps these
Indians, like the Australians, thought by this mutilation to disarm the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account