17. Si quis voluerit 17. If any man will do the
voluntatem eius facere, will of him: he shall know of
cognoscet de doctrina utrum ex the doctrine, whether it be of
Deo sit, an ego a meipso God, or whether I speak of
loquar. myself.
18. Qui a semetipso loquitur, 18. He that speaketh of
gloriam propriam quaerit: qui himself, seeketh his own
autem quaerit gloriam eius qui glory: but he that seeketh the
misit eum, hic verax est, et glory of him that sent him, he
iniustitia in illo non est. is true, and there is no
injustice in him.
17, 18. In proof that His doctrine is from God, He appeals to two
arguments:—(1) If they will only follow the will of God, and believe,
_experience_ will teach them that His doctrine is divine. (2) The fact
that He seeks not His own glory, but the glory of the Father, is a proof
that His doctrine is the doctrine of the Father, and, therefore a proof
that He is veracious, and does not deceive (_injustitia_ in illo non est).
This second argument, as Mald. points out, is based upon what does, not
upon what should, happen among men. When men preach doctrines of their own
invention, they generally seek their own glory.
19. Nonne Moyses dedit vobis 19. Did not Moses give you the
legem: et nemo ex vobis facit law, and _yet_ none of you
legem? keepeth the law?
20. Quid me quaeritis 20. Why seek you to kill me?
interficere? Respondit turba, The multitude answered and
et dixit: Daemonium habes: said: Thou hast a devil; who
quis te quaerit interficere? seeketh to kill thee?
19, 20. Most probably Christ begins here to defend Himself against the
charge of violating the Sabbath, which the Jews had brought against Him on
a former occasion (v. 16, 18), and which they still remembered against
Him.
He uses an “argumentum ad hominem”: You do not keep the law yourselves,
why then seek to kill Me, even for what you allege to be a violation of
it? Some among the crowd were even then anxious to kill Jesus, as His
words prove, and to these He directs His words; but there were many
present who had no such intention, and some of these reply, *Thou hast a
devil*. They may have meant that He was possessed, or simply that He was
raving, out of His senses.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account