16, 17. The Pharisees themselves disagree as to the character of Christ,
and ask the man who had been cured (note how he is still spoken of as
blind, just as in the Blessed Eucharist (vi. 52) the flesh of Christ is
spoken of as bread, not because it is any longer bread, but because of
what it is known to have been shortly before) what he thought of Him who
cured him. His reply is that Christ is a prophet (προφητής without the
article), a man sent by God; not _the_ Prophet, for he did not yet
recognise Christ as the Messias.
18. Non crediderunt ergo 18. The Jews then did not
Iudaei de illo quia caecus believe concerning him, that
fuisset et vidisset, donec he had been blind and had
vocaverunt parentes eius qui received his sight, until they
viderat: call the parents of him that
had received his sight.
18. The Pharisees now doubt the _fact_ of the cure, and send for the man’s
parents to inquire if he had indeed been born blind.
19. Et interrogaverunt eos, 19. And asked them, saying: Is
dicentes: Hic est filius this your son, who you say was
vester, quem vos dicitis quia born blind? How then doth he
caecus natus est? Quomodo ergo now see?
nunc videt?
20. Responderunt eis parentes 20. His parents answered them
eius, et dixerunt: Scimus quia and said: We know that this is
hic est filius noster, et quia our son, and that he was born
caecus natus est: blind.
21. Quomodo autem nunc videat, 21. But how he now seeth, we
nescimus: aut quis eius know not: or who hath opened
aperuit oculos, nos nescimus: his eyes, we know not: ask
ipsum interrogate: aetatem himself; he is of age, let him
habet, ipse de se loquatur. speak for himself.
19‐21. Three questions are put to the parents; to two they reply: that
this is their son, and that he was born blind; but to the third they
return no answer, though, doubtless, they believed their son’s account of
the cure.
22. Haec dixerunt parentes 22. These things his parents
eius, quoniam timebant said, because they feared the
Iudaeos: iam enim Jews: For the Jews had already
conspiraverant Iudaei, ut si agreed among themselves, that
quis eum confiteretur esse if any man should confess him
Christum, extra synagogam to be Christ, he should be put
fieret. out of the synagogue.
22. *Put out of the synagogue*; that is to say, deprived of all religious
intercourse by a sort of excommunication.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account