only real difficulty here is that to which we have already replied,
arising from the danger of scandal, through our Lord’s associating with
such a woman.
Thus far we have spoken only of “the sinner,” and the sister of Lazarus;
but there is a further question, whether Mary Magdalen (Luke viii. 2;
Matt. xxvii. 56, 61; Matt. xxviii. 1; John xx. 1, &c.) and they are all
three, one and the same person. We believe it to be more probable that
they are. The more common opinion among the fathers identifies the three;
from the sixth till the seventeenth century their identity was
unquestioned in the Western Church; and our Roman Breviary and Missal
still identify them on the Feast of St. Mary Magdalen, the 22nd of July.
So, too, Tertull., Gregory the Great, Mald., Natal‐Alex., Mauduit, M’Ev.,
Corluy.
We have stated what we consider the most probable view—that Christ was
twice anointed during His public life, and on both occasions by the same
person, the sister of Lazarus, who is identical with “the sinner” and
Magdalen. It is right, however, that we should add, that there is great
diversity of opinion, even among Catholic commentators. Some have held
that there were three different unctions, others that there was only one.
Some have held that the sister of Lazarus, “the sinner,” and Magdalen are
all three distinct; others, that at least the sister of Lazarus and the
sinner are distinct; and among those who will not admit the identity of
all three are found such able commentators as St. Chrys., Estius, Calmet,
Beelen. In such a case, where the Scriptures are obscure, where the
fathers disagree, where commentators are so divided, and the Greek Church,
which celebrates three different feasts for the three women, _seems_ (we
say _seems_, because the different feasts might possibly be celebrated in
honour of the same woman) to differ from the Latin, it is hard to attain
to anything more than probability, and we have set forth above what, after
a very careful examination of the whole question, seems to us most
probable. See Corl., _Dissert._, p. 263 and foll.; Mald. on Matt. xxvi. 6,
7, and xxvii. 56; Steenk. on Matt. _Quaes._ 678.
3. Miserunt ergo sorores eius 3. His sisters therefore sent
ad eum, dicentes: Domine, ecce to him, saying: Lord, behold,
quem amas infirmatur. he whom thou lovest is sick.
3. They merely announce their trouble through a messenger, and in hopeful
confidence leave the remedy to Jesus. “Sufficit ut noveris: non enim amas
et deseris” (St. Aug. on this verse).
4. Audiens autem Iesus dixit 4. And Jesus hearing it, said
eis: Infirmitas haec non est to them: This sickness is not
ad mortem, sed pro gloria Dei, unto death, but for the glory
ut glorificetur Filius Dei per of God: that the Son of God
eam. may be glorified by it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account