25. *In proverbs.* The word translated “proverbs” is παροιμίαις, which
signifies not merely proverbial, but also obscure or figurative language;
and this is the sense here, as is proved by the antithesis between
speaking “in proverbs” and speaking “plainly.” “These things,” then,
concerning His death, His resurrection, His return to the Father, the
“little whiles,” &c., He had spoken obscurely. We must hold that the words
of institution of the Blessed Eucharist are not included in “these
things.” They did not belong to this discourse _after_ the Last Supper,
but were spoken during the supper. Moreover, had they been obscure, surely
three Evangelists and St. Paul would not have narrated them without some
explanation.
*The hour cometh when I will no more speak to you in proverbs.* “Hour” is
the ordinary Hebraism for time. Some refer this to the next life, some to
the forty days of Christ’s risen life, and some to the time after
Pentecost. With St. Aug. and Mald. we prefer this latter view, for the
first opinion seems excluded by the next verse, where it is said they will
ask of the Father during the time in question, and we know they shall not
require to ask in heaven. The second opinion too (unless it be joined with
the third) is improbable, for it was not till the day of Pentecost, when
they were “endued with power from on high” (Luke xxvi. 49), that they were
able to bear plain speaking, or that Christ _through the Holy Ghost_ spoke
plainly to them.
26. In illo die in nomine meo 26. In that day you shall ask
petetis: et non dico vobis in my name: and I say not to
quia ego rogabo Patrem de you, that I will ask the
vobis: Father for you:
26. *I say not to you, that I will ask the Father for you.* The sense is:
I need not say, I do not need to tell you, that I will ask the Father for
you. This form of expression is what is called “praeteritio,” not
“exclusio,” for we know that Christ is “always living to intercede for us”
(Heb. vii. 25). The connection in the following verse: “For the Father
Himself,” &c., shows that Christ also wished to intimate that such
intercession on His part would not be necessary, because the Father
Himself would be prompt to hear and answer their prayers. Thus they should
understand that, though Christ, their advocate, was leaving them, yet they
had no reason to be disheartened, since the Father unsolicited would love
them and hear their prayers, because they had loved Christ, and believed
Him to be the Messias sent by God.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account