The Government of England (Vol. I)Lowell, A. Lawrence (Abbott Lawrence)
History
The Government of England (Vol. I)
Lowell, A. Lawrence (Abbott Lawrence)
Great Britain -- Politics and government
[232:2] Rogers, II., 360. In a case at the general election of 1906,
where bribery was proved, the election was upheld because the judges
disagreed on the question of agency. Great Yarmouth, 5 O'M. & H., 176.
[233:1] 46-47 Vic., c. 51, § 63.
[233:2] Rogers, II., 157-58.
[233:3] Counties of Elgin and Nairn, 5 O'M. & H., 1.
[233:4] Rogers, II., 162.
[233:5] _Ibid._, 259, 268.
[233:6] Lichfield Div., 5 O'M. & H., 27, at 34-38.
[233:7] Counties of Elgin & Nairn, 5 O'M. & H., 1.
[233:8] _Cf._ Lichfield Div., 5 O'M. & H., 27; Haggerston Div., _Ibid._,
68, at 72-88, St. George's Div., _Ibid._, 89. So of treating, Great
Yarmouth, _Ibid._, 176, at 198.
[234:1] Hastings, 1 O'M. & H., 217, at 218.
[234:2] Subscriptions _bona fide_ made for public or charitable purposes
are not election expenses, Rogers, II., 161-62. But it is not easy to
say what is _bona fides_; for gifts of this kind by a candidate for
Parliament who has no other connection with the constituency must always
be made, in part at least, for the sake of indirectly gaining votes by
increasing his popularity.
[234:3] 46-47 Vic., c. 51, § 59.
[235:1] Com. Papers, 1898, IX., 555.
[236:1] Walsall, 4 O'M. & H., 123, at 126.
[236:2] Pontefract, 4 O'M. & H., 200.
[236:3] Southampton, 5 O'M. & H., 17.
[236:4] Lichfield Div., 5 O'M. & H., 27, at 29-30.
[237:1] Haggerston Div., 5 O'M. & H., 68, at 84.
[237:2] St. George's Div., 5 O'M. & H., 89, at 96.
[237:3] 46-47 Vic., c. 51, §§ 4, 11.
[237:4] After the general election of 1906 one member was unseated for
bribery by his agents. Worcester, 5 O'M. & H., 212.
CHAPTER XI
THE HOUSE OF COMMONS
_Disqualifications, Privilege, Sessions_
[Sidenote: Disqualifications for Parliament.]
No property qualification is now required for sitting in the House of
Commons, and any male British subject may be elected, who is not
specially debarred.[239:1]
Infants are excluded both at Common Law, and by statute, although this
rule has been disregarded in several notable instances, the best known
cases being those of Charles James Fox and Lord John Russell who entered
Parliament before they came of age. Incurable insanity was a
disqualification at Common Law, and so by statute is confinement in a
lunatic hospital. But it would seem that a temporary lunatic, if at
large, is not incompetent to sit and vote.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account