The government of the Ottoman Empire in the time of Suleiman the MagnificentLybyer, Albert Howe
History
The government of the Ottoman Empire in the time of Suleiman the Magnificent
Lybyer, Albert Howe
Süleyman I, Sultan of the Turks, 1494 or 1495-1566; Turkey -- Politics and government
The _Seids_, also known as _Emirs_ or _Sherifs_, were a class apart
among the Ottomans. They were not properly members of the _Ulema_,
unless, like others, they passed through the schools; they owed their
distinction rather to a real or assumed genealogy which carried their
ancestry back to the Prophet Mohammed. They alone were privileged to
wear a green turban. They were numerous; but the claims of many were
doubted, and some of them seem to have possessed reputations that were
far from savory.[656] They constituted the only hereditary nobility among
the Ottomans, but their privileges appear to have been personal rather
than financial: they were not to be struck, for example, on penalty
of severe punishment, and they had their own justice. Great honor was
shown to two members of this nobility, descendants of the Prophet:
to the _Mir-Alem_, the sultan’s standard-bearer, who was regularly a
_Seid_, and had precedence of all the officers of the army; and to the
_Nakib ol-Eshraf_, head of the _Seids_, who ranked second in the Moslem
Institution, and at the ceremonies of Bairam had precedence even of the
_Mufti_. The _Nakib ol-Eshraf_ was appointed by the sultan for life;
that member of the _Ulema_ who was a _Seid_ and who ranked highest when
the place fell vacant was ordinarily chosen. He had a staff of officers
and clerks in the capital and the provinces, and was head of the separate
jurisdiction of the _Seids_. Under the sultan he held despotic authority
over all _Seids_; and, when the sovereign ordered the punishment or death
of one of them, the _Nakib ol-Eshraf_ was commissioned to carry out the
execution.
Dervishes also were not members of the _Ulema_. They were of many orders,
though sixteenth-century observers seem to have been impressed with but
four.[657] They represented in Islam the monks, the hermits, and the
begging friars of Christianity. Through them heresies spread, uprisings
were concocted, mobs were gathered, and holy war was preached. On more
than one occasion they endangered the power of the government.[658] Many
were honest, God-fearing folk, while others were scarcely more than
tramps and wandering thieves.
Clergy, _Seids_, and dervishes represented the merely religious side
of the Moslem Institution. Islam was fundamentally a religion without
priests, monks, or nobles; and these persons never grew to possess
permanent influence and power in the Ottoman state.[659]
JURISTS AND THE MUFTI
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account