TÜRCKEN, BERNARDIN. Getrewe und wolmeynende kurtze Erinnerung von der Türcken Ordnung, in iren Kriegen vñ Veldtschlachten. Burgel, 1542. UBICINI, A[BDOLONYME]. État présent de l’empire ottoman. Paris, 1876. URBINUS, THEOPHILUS. Türckisches Städt-Büchlein. Nuremberg, 1664. URSU, J[ON]. La politique orientale de François I (1515-1547). Paris, 1908. VAMBÉRY, HERMANN (ARMINIUS). Die primitive Cultur des turko-tatarischen Volkes auf grund sprachlicher Forschungen. Leipsic, 1879.—See p. 306. —— Uigurische Sprachmonumente und das Kudatku Bilik. Innsbruck, 1870.—See p. 306. VENIER, MAFFEO. Relazione, 1579, 1587. In Alberi’s _Relazione_, 3d series, i. 437-468, ii. 295-307. Florence, 1840-1844. VIAGGI fatti da Vinetia, alla tana ... in Costantinopoli. Venice, 1543.—Contains Libri Tre, etc., of RAMBERTI, _q. v._ YOUSSOUF FEHMI. Histoire de la Turquie. Paris, 1909. YUSEF KHASS HAJIL. Kudatku Bilik (Art of Government). See VAMBÉRY, Uigurische Sprachmonumente, etc. ZANE, MATTEO. Relazione, 1594. In Alberi’s _Relazione_, 3d series, iii. 381-444. Florence, 1855. ZEN (or ZENO), PIETRO. Itinerario, 1523. In Fulin’s _Diarii_, 104-136. Venice, 1881. —— Relazione, 1524, 1530. In Alberi’s _Relazione_, 3d series, iii. 93-97, 119-122. Florence, 1855. ZINKEISEN, J. W. Geschichte des osmanischen Reiches in Europa. 7 vols. and Index, Hamburg and Gotha, 1840-1863.—See p. 321. FOOTNOTES [1] Cahun, _Introduction à l’Histoire de l’Asie_, 90. [2] The West was much concerned in the sixteenth century with the problem of ascertaining the origin of the Turks. Balbus gives an idea how difficult it was to reach a definite opinion: “Some count the Turks among the Asiatic Sarmatians, and say that they were expelled by their neighbors from the Caspian mountains into Persia, and descended into Asia Minor. Others, following the name, perhaps, think that this people had its beginning in Turce, a great and opulent city of the Persians. Others consider them the progeny of the Parthians. Some think the Turks had their origin in Arabia, and some in Syria. But it is more likely that they were Scythians by origin, and (as we said above) from the foot of Mount Caucasus, and that they formerly inhabited vast deserts.” See also Knolles, 1-2. [3] Keane, _Man, Past and Present_, 268, 314-315. Holdich (in _Encyclopaedia Britannica_, 11th ed., ii. 749 b) says, “As ethnographical inquiry advances the Turk appears to recede from his Mongolian affinities and to approach the Caucasian.” Keene (_Turks in India_, 1 ff.) is inclined to consider the Turks a mere mixture of Mongols with Caucasians. So bald a theory does not account for the group of Turkish languages. [4] Keane, 267. [5] _Ibid._ 317. [6] _Ibid._ 322; Hammer, _Geschichte_, i. 3. [7] Keane, 322; Hammer, _Geschichte_, i. 2; etc. [8] Hammer, _Geschichte_, i. 1. This fact, known to Knolles (p. 2), seems to have escaped the attention of Sir Charles Eliot (_Encyclopaedia Britannica_, 11th ed., xxvii. 470 d).