Europe -- Politics and government; Political science
*214. Sovereignty and the Division of Powers.*--The Germans are not
themselves altogether agreed concerning the nature and precise
location of sovereignty within the Empire, but it is reasonably clear
that sovereignty, in the ultimate meaning of that much misused term,
is vested in the government of the Empire, and not in that of any
state. The embodiment of that sovereignty, as will appear
subsequently, is not the national parliament, nor yet the Emperor, but
the Bundesrath, which represents the "totality" of the affiliated
governments.[287] As in the United States, Switzerland, and federal
nations generally, there is a division of powers of government between
the central governmental establishment and the states. The powers of
the Imperial government, it is important to observe, are specifically
enumerated; those of the states are residual. It is within the
competence of the Imperial government to bring about an enlargement of
the powers that have been confided to it; but until it does so in any
particular direction the power of the state governments in that
direction is unlimited. On the one hand, there is a considerable field
of legislative activity--in respect to citizenship, tariffs, weights,
measures, coinage, patents, military and naval establishment of the
Empire, etc.--in which the Empire, by virtue of constitutional
stipulation, possesses exclusive power to act.[288] On the other,
there is a no less extensive domain reserved entirely to the
states--the determination of their own forms of government, of laws of
succession, of relations of church and state, of questions pertaining
to their internal administration; the framing of their own budgets,
police regulations, highway laws and laws relating to land tenure; the
control of public instruction. Between lies a broad and shifting area,
which each may enter, but within which the Imperial authority, in so
far as is warranted by the constitution, must be accorded precedence
over the authority of a state. "The matters over which the states
preserve control," says a great German jurist, "cannot be separated
completely from those to which extends the competence of the Empire.
The various powers of government are intimately related the one to
another. They run together and at the same time impose mutual checks
in so many ways, and are so interlaced, that one cannot hope to set
them off by a line of demarcation, or to set up among them a Chinese
wall of division. In every sphere of their activity the states (p. 206)
encounter a superior power to which they are obliged to submit. They
are free to move only in the circle which Imperial law-making leaves
open to them. That circle does exist. It is delimited, but not wholly
occupied, by the Empire.... In a certain sense it may be said that it
is only by sufferance of the Empire that the states maintain their
political rights at all, and that, at best, their tenure is
precarious."[289]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account