Europe -- Politics and government; Political science
[Footnote 310: For an excellent discussion of this
general subject see W. J. Shepard, Tendencies
toward Ministerial Responsibility in Germany, in
_American Political Science Review_, Feb., 1911. In
the course of an impassioned speech in the
Reichstag in 1912, occasioned by a storm of protest
against the Emperor's alleged threat to withdraw
the newly granted constitution of Alsace-Lorraine,
Chancellor von Bethmann-Hollweg stated the theory
and fact of the office which he holds in these
sentences: "No situation has been created for which
I cannot take the responsibility. As long as I
stand in this place I shield the Emperor (_trete
ich vor den Kaiser_). This not for courtiers'
considerations, of which I know nothing, but as in
duty bound. When I cannot satisfy this my duty you
will see me no more in this place."]
There is a clause of the constitution[311] which confers upon the (p. 215)
Chancellor the right to delegate the power to represent him to _any
other_ member of the Bundesrath; whence it seems to follow that the
Chancellor must be himself a member of that body. The relations of the
Empire and the Prussian kingdom practically require, further, that the
Chancellor be identified with the Prussian contingent in the federal
chamber. Since, however, the Emperor, in his capacity of king of
Prussia, designates the Prussian delegates in that body, it is open to
him to make such an appointment in this second capacity as will enable
him when selecting, in his Imperial capacity, a chancellor to procure
the services of the man he wants.
[Footnote 311: Art. 15, cl. 2. Dodd, Modern
Constitutions, I., 331.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account