| | | | | | | | | | | | | | _Moltke_ | 1908–9 | 22,640 | 27.25 | 3,200 | 10, 11″ | 4 | 11″ }| tapering | 4″ | 4″ | 5″ | 10″ | ? same as | Ditto | | | | | 12, 5″.9 | | }| | | | | | _Seydlitz_ | | | | | | | | }| | | | | | | _Von der Tann_ | 1907–8 | 19,100 | 26.0 | 2,900 | 8, 11″ | 4 | 9¾″}| | 4″ | 4″ | 5″ | 9″ | ? same as | Side armoured up | | | | | 10, 5″.9 | | }| | | | | | _Seydlitz_ | to main deck with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | secondary battery | | | | | | | | | | | | | | armoured to upper | | | | | | | | | | | | | | deck. ---------------------------+-----------+--------------+-------+----------+------------+-----------+-------+--------------+--------+--------+-----------+--------+------------+------------------- [H] _Lutzow_ was similar. TABLE V Comparison of weight of armour in British and German ships of the same date. N. B.--The German figures are approximate.