As the history given below shows, the variety is an old one but it, with
Norton, was condemned by the early vineyardists because it could be
propagated from cuttings only with the greatest difficulty. Like most of
its species, Cynthiana is somewhat particular as to soil and location,
preferring sandy or gravelly loams and not thriving on clays or
limestones. While very resistant to phylloxera, it is not now much used
as a resistant stock because of the superiority of varieties of
Rupestris and because it is not easily propagated. It is very resistant
to cryptogamic diseases, mildew, black-rot and anthracnose, and is a
strong, vigorous grower. Its cycle of vegetation is long, the buds
bursting forth early and the fruit maturing very late. It has no value
as a table grape but according to the _Bushberg Catalogue_[175] it is
the best American grape for red wine. So, too, according to Viala,[176]
the wine from Cynthiana is the best of all the red wines produced from
American vines. It is said by French wine-makers[177] to contain "an
excess of all the elements which constitute the best ordinary wines,
color, tannin, acidity, and bouquet," and therefore to make a splendid
base for blending with wine from varieties lacking in the above
elements.
Cynthiana was received, some time in the fifties by Prince of Flushing,
Long Island, from Arkansas where it is said to have been found growing
in the woods. It was sent by Prince to Husmann at Hermann, Missouri,
where it did so well and was so highly spoken of by Husmann and his
neighbors that it soon became known to grape-growers. It was placed upon
the grape list of the American Pomological Society fruit catalog in
1881, where it still remains. Like Norton, Cynthiana is often considered
pure Aestivalis, although a strain of some other blood, probably
Labrusca, is apparent. Because of the similarity of this variety and
Norton the one is often grown as the other.
Vine vigorous, healthy, hardy, usually a good yielder. Canes medium
to nearly long, numerous, of average size, dark brown to
reddish-brown, sometimes with faint ash-gray tinge, surface covered
with thick blue bloom; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes short
to medium; diaphragm rather thin; pith of medium size; shoots
slightly glabrous; tendrils intermittent to continuous, above
medium in length, bifid.
Leaf-buds small, short, slender, pointed to conical. Leaves
variable in size, thick, firm; upper surface dark green, dull,
rugose; lower surface slightly tinged with blue, faintly pubescent,
cobwebby; veins distinct; lobes variable in number, terminal lobe
acute; petiolar sinus deep, narrow, closed and sometimes
overlapping; basal sinus shallow; lateral sinus rather shallow and
narrow; teeth shallow, of average width; stamens upright.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account