The Great Acceptance: The Life Story of F. N. CharringtonThorne, Guy
History
The Great Acceptance: The Life Story of F. N. Charrington
Thorne, Guy
Charrington, Fredk. N. (Frederick Nicholas), 1850-1936; Poor -- England -- London
"Mr. Mason, the shorthand writer, who also gave his evidence
admirably, was a witness to the same effect. As Mr. Kerwin, another
witness for the defendant, said (and I believe him rather than the
plaintiffs' witnesses on this point), if Mr. Charrington had been left
to himself, there would have been no crowd and no disturbance. What
they said is this: I mean, what Friend particularly does, and Young
also; they try to incite the passers-by, and those persons who are
coming from the music hall are irritated. Well, it is said, it is
natural they are irritated; I have no doubt, and it is a fair
observation to make, that they are, to some extent, naturally incited
against him. They look upon this as a crusade against the music hall;
but they have gone far beyond, in my opinion, what they were justified
in doing. They called on the mob to shout, and, on several occasions,
certainly, Friend has tried to incite them, by saying, 'Halloa, boys,
halloa!'
"They assail him with foul and filthy language and they have cursed
him and they have sworn at him; they have assailed him with flour and
with pease-pudding; they have knocked his hat off; they have kicked
him, and the roughs from the hall have certainly made a dead set upon
him. On one occasion he was assaulted, and the man was committed to
prison for three months. They have actually, some of them, thrown
human filth from the windows. On one occasion, particularly, there was
a violent attack made upon him; that is, in October 1883, and I am
satisfied that that was an organised attack. He was driven across the
road, and had to seek refuge in a police section house on the opposite
side. On one occasion they gave him in charge, and the magistrate
dismissed the case, making, I am satisfied on the result of the
evidence, observations which showed that the charge was wholly
groundless. Mr. Piggott, who was a witness for the plaintiffs (and who
denied what I am about to state, but I think he was in error; I think
Mr. Piggott was an excitable man, and a strong partisan), threatened
him with a stick. Besides this, the defendant has been kicked.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account