The great betrayal (La trahison des clercs)Benda, Julien
Philosophy
The great betrayal (La trahison des clercs)
Benda, Julien
Intellectuals; Nationalism; Philosophy, Modern
‘Glaringly unjust is the war of him who declares war only from ambition
and from the desire to extend his dominions beyond their legitimate
boundaries, from the desire to possess a more commodious country
in which to establish himself, from the fear of the great power of
a neighbouring prince with whom he is at peace, or from the desire
to despoil a rival solely because he is thought unworthy of the
possessions or States he holds or of a right which legitimately belongs
to him, because a ruler is inconvenienced by him and wants to get rid
of this inconvenience by force of arms.’[91] On the other hand, there
are an immense number of works to-day which need only a little twisting
to make them justify every attempt at conquest. For instance, the view
that a war is just ‘if it can invoke the necessity of safeguarding
the common good and public tranquillity, the recapture of things
unjustly carried off, the repression of rebels, the defence of the
innocent’.[92] And the view which asserts that ‘war is just when it
is necessary to a nation either to defend itself against invasion, or
_to overthrow the obstacles thwarting the exercise of its rights_.’[93]
At the beginning of the last century the Church still taught that war
could only be just for one of the two belligerents.[94] It is heavy
with consequences that she has now abandoned this position and to-day
asserts that war may be just on both sides at once, ‘from the moment
when each of the two adversaries, without being certain of its right,
considers it as simply probable after having taken the opinion of its
counsellors’.[95] Here is another serious thing: In the past, war
would only be declared just when it was against an adversary who had
committed an injury _accompanied by a moral intention_, whereas to-day
it may be declared just if it is directed against a material injury
caused without any malice,[96] for instance, an accidental violation of
frontier. It is certain that to-day Napoleon and Bismarck could find
in the teaching of the Church more justification than ever for their
incursions.[97]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account