The great betrayal (La trahison des clercs)Benda, Julien
Philosophy
The great betrayal (La trahison des clercs)
Benda, Julien
Intellectuals; Nationalism; Philosophy, Modern
‘Have you noticed that the eight Beatitudes, the Sermon on the Mount,
the Gospels, the whole of primitive Christian literature, contain not
one word which sets military virtues among those which lead to the
Kingdom of Heaven?’ (Renan, _First Letter to Strauss_.)[124]
Let me observe that I am not reproaching the Christian preacher for
giving their due to glory and other earthly passions, I am only
reproaching him for trying to pretend that he is in harmony with his
institution when he does so. We do not ask that the Christian shall not
violate the Christian law; we only ask him to know that he is breaking
it when he does break it. This seems to me admirably brought out by
the remark of Cardinal Lavigerie who was asked: ‘What would you do,
Eminence, if someone slapped your right cheek?’ and who replied, ‘I
know what I ought to do, but I do not know what I should do.’ _I know
what I ought to do_, and therefore what I ought to teach. A man who
speaks in that way may give way to every species of violence, and yet
maintain Christian morality. Here actions are nothing; the judgment on
the actions is everything.
Must I repeat that I am not deploring the fact that the cults of honour
and courage should be preached to human beings; I am deploring the fact
that they are preached _by the ‘clerks’_. Civilization, I repeat, seems
to me possible only if humanity consents to a division of functions, if
side by side with those who carry out the lay passions and extol the
virtues serviceable to them there exists a class of men who depreciate
these passions and glorify the advantages which are beyond the
material. What I think serious is that this class of men should cease
to perform their office, and that those whose duty was to quench human
pride should extol the same impulses of soul as the leaders of armies.
I shall be told that this preaching is imposed on the ‘clerks’, at
least in war-time, by the laymen, by the States, who to-day intend to
mobilize all the moral resources of the nation for their ends.[125]
But what amazes me is not so much that I see the ‘clerks’ preaching in
this manner, as to see them do it with such docility, such absence of
disgust, such enthusiasm, such joy.... The truth is that the ‘clerks’
have become as much laymen as the laymen themselves.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account