The great fraud of UlsterHealy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
History
The great fraud of Ulster
Healy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
Ireland -- History -- 17th century; Ulster (Northern Ireland and Ireland) -- History
On the 1st August, 1660, a frigate left Dublin by royal command
to fetch the Earl of Donegall to England. To forestall the enemy
Clotworthy presented a petition on the 6th August, 1660, praying
the King to confirm Basil’s lease. At the same moment the London
Corporation was moving for a royal charter to replace Cromwell’s.
Thus there were stirring around Whitehall three rival claimants
for the northern fisheries. Charles felt bound, as Cromwell did,
to respect the pledges made to the Corporation as to their Ulster
estate. He was largely a stranger to events in Ireland during
his exile; and was attended at Court for Irish affairs by Bishop
Bramhall, late of Derry, and formerly chaplain to Strafford.
Bramhall had followed Charles to the Continent, and exercised there
“curiously unepiscopal functions as a Royalist prize-agent.” To
him Clotworthy’s petition was referred; and, on the day it was
received, the Bishop reported in its favour, without making the
smallest inquiry. Such haste in an Episcopalian dignitary to help a
Presbyterian “malignant” shows how these Christians loved one another.
Sir John’s petition was a network of falsehoods. It re-hashed a
number of old fables about the long-lost “pension,” with a few new
ones for garnish. Beginning with a lie in point of date, it set
forth that Sir John had a pension of 6s. 8d. a day granted him by
Patent on the 2nd July, 1640. In 1640 Bramhall was Strafford’s
chaplain; and this romance cannot have imposed on him. Strafford
sailed from Ireland in April, 1640, to crush the Scotch rebellion,
knowing that Clotworthy was his bitter enemy. He left behind him as
Deputy a loving friend, Wandesforde, who was also Bramhall’s patron;
and Bramhall, of all men, was aware that Wandesforde would not
have sanctioned a pension to an opponent deep in intrigue with the
Parliamentarians to compass the Lord Lieutenant’s downfall. Besides
in 1640 Sir John was only 34 years old, and had performed no service
to merit reward. The pension to his father was dated the 2nd July,
1618, twenty-two years earlier. So a false date was put forward lest,
if 1618 were mentioned, inquiry might be set on foot to unravel the
mystery of a pension to a child under twelve years of age.
The Petition went on to pretend that Sir John had been “obstructed
in the receipt of his pension by the usurper Oliver.” This was
colossal mendacity, but the account given of Basil’s lease surpassed
it:—“On application, the late Oliver granted him, in lieu of the said
pension, a lease of 99 years for Lough Neagh and the River Bann, with
the fishing thereof.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account