The great fraud of UlsterHealy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
History
The great fraud of Ulster
Healy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
Ireland -- History -- 17th century; Ulster (Northern Ireland and Ireland) -- History
This pilferage must be reckoned as one of Chichester’s most dexterous
fetches. In skill it outdid even the budding of the life-estate in
Lough Neagh on the thirteen-and-fourpenny “command” at Carrickfergus.
Still, its success was influentially contributed to by others.
The trick required the collusion of the Attorney-General, the
Solicitor-General, the Chancellor-Archbishop of Dublin, the Chief
Justice, the Chief Baron, the Master of the Rolls, the principal
Secretary of State, and the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Every high
official was needed as an accomplice; and not one of them flinched.
These were the men who embodied the civilising influences which
replaced the less facile justice of the “lewd” Brehon Code.
Latent merit also lurked in the Patent, as an instrument of chicane.
It vested great estates in an outsider, who could assign them to
the Deputy with a title free from apparent taint. It overlaid with
veneer the frauds connected with John Wakeman, John King, Thomas
Irelande, Auditor Ware, and James Hamilton. It wafted an air of
kingly approval over a barefaced theft. It stripped Sir Randal quite
noiselessly, and handed his fishery to a stranger alleged to be
“dear” to his Majesty. In form it was a royal grant, which, though
obtained by the prostitution of the Commission, was redolent of
legality.
When these shifts, re-shifts, and makeshifts to secure a semblance
of lawful origin for Chichester’s booty were accomplished, the grant
was garnished with the Great Seal of Ireland. Within six months of
that solemn rite Bassett transferred everything back to his loving
uncle. The conveyance from him, of course, was kept a secret, like
Hamilton’s assignment, and was never enrolled. A knighthood was
Bassett’s reward, and the Deputy prescribed in his will that he
should be buried in the same tomb with himself at Carrickfergus.
There each worthy now lies awaiting the judgment of the Resurrection.
Contrasted with Chichester’s refusal to remedy, by the same
machinery, the pretended blot in the Patent of Hugh O’Neill, the
parchment issued to Bassett attracts lasting interest. O’Neill’s
grant was the outcome of a National treaty which ended a nine years’
war. Bassett’s was a swindle carried out against the King and his
subjects. Criminality permeated it even to minor details. The fine
due to the Crown on its being issued was left unpaid, in spite of a
recital that £20 had been lodged in the Exchequer, and in this way
the King was both pettily and grossly cheated.
While this Patent was a-making, Sir Randal renewed his appeal to the
King. He was, however, unexpectedly thwarted at Court, and for the
first time tasted defeat. Umbraged and disconsolate, he was sent
home from London, but immediately recommenced his efforts, and not
altogether without success. The discouraged chief, who had never even
heard of Bassett, wrote to Cecil on the 19th August, 1608:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account