The great fraud of UlsterHealy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
History
The great fraud of Ulster
Healy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
Ireland -- History -- 17th century; Ulster (Northern Ireland and Ireland) -- History
The verdict when engrossed was personally signed by Chichester. The
Archbishop of Armagh and the Bishop of Derry added their saintly
names. These were followed by the signatures of the Attorney-General,
the Chief Justice, the Surveyor-General, and the Vice-Treasurer.
The “lewd” Brehons’ finding was worthily witnessed in Church and
State. As Parsons subscribed it his mind must have turned back in
placid contemplation to the Antrim Inquisition of 1605, when he first
shuffled the cards to jink success to his master in the great game he
was playing.
The Deputy, from beneath O’Cahan’s roof, dispatched an austere
account of the proceedings to the King. Having circumvented the
royal policy, he edified his Majesty by inveighing against “the
insatiable humours of craving men,” and held forth on “the duty
and service I owe to my sovereign.” He wound up with the boast
that “the justice of the land, without being thought a praiser of
myself, was never distributed with more clean hands in this kingdom.”
Davies sent a companion report which glowed with ecstacy over their
visit, but omitted everything that the King ought to have known.
As they compared notes for these dispatches the walls of O’Cahan’s
castle must have rocked with laughter. The augurs sometimes enjoyed
themselves.
While this sport went forward the Corporation of London, which was
about to levy a heavy assessment on its citizens to defray the cost
of the Plantation, had its agents in the North to view the country.
They met the Deputy at Limavady just as his letters were being sent
off to James I. They discussed with him the terms of the proposed
Charter, and he gave them much wise counsel as to the carriage of
their adventure. The one point he forgot to mention was that he was
an adverse claimant against them for the Bann and Lough Foyle—the
chief ingredients in their bargain.
As they took their leave the agents warmly gave thanks, believing
him to be a stout ally; and, on reaching London, they reported in
favour of the Plantation. Five months later (28th January, 1610) the
City accepted a grant of County Derry, with the Bann and Lough Foyle,
and agreed to “plant” the North. No more solemn State contract is on
record. Yet it was cankered from its inception by official duplicity.
When James I. learnt through Sir Randal MacDonnell of the transfer
of the tidal Bann to Hamilton he did not realise—angry though he
was—that the non-tidal river and Lough Neagh had also been granted
away. He therefore promised to reacquire for the Londoners at his
own expense what he supposed had been inadvertently parted with.
Chichester never openly asserted ownership of the fisheries, for
he hoped that a breakdown would occur in the negotiations with the
City. These, indeed, were often on the verge of miscarriage; but, as
time and argument went on, one obstacle after another was overcome.
Finally the agreement of 1610 became the Charter of 1613.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account