The great fraud of UlsterHealy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
History
The great fraud of Ulster
Healy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
Ireland -- History -- 17th century; Ulster (Northern Ireland and Ireland) -- History
This could only mean that Buckingham was to get the secret procedure
(which the King had ordained) quashed; and allow St. John to hold
any future inquiry in public before the Privy Council, where
Chichester’s creatures held the majority. Blundell’s “arguments”
were so powerful that Buckingham prevailed on the King to drop the
proceedings, and Balfour’s mission ended in smoke. The “articles
exhibited” by him, and the correspondence between the English and
Irish Executives, are not given a place in the State Papers. Only for
disjointed entries and letters in the family archives of Hamilton
and Chichester, posterity would never have heard of the perils they
ran or the struggles of St. John to rescue them. The official records
must have been made away with. Balfour before long was consoled
for the abandonment of the investigation. To keep his mouth shut
he was presented with lands in Ulster after his return to England,
and therewith rested content. Amongst his papers printed in 1837 by
the Abbotsford Club (Edinburgh) were copies of Hamilton’s “Thomas
Irelande” Letter of the 6th December, 1604, and that of the 16th
April, 1605, granting Sir Con O’Neill’s estate. These evidently
formed part of his “brief” for the Discovery.
Even if Balfour’s inquiry had been pressed home, the resourceful
Chichester would not have been taken unawares. He had skilfully
tampered with the State ledgers to prepare a bulwark of defence
if challenged as to his part in the seizure of the fisheries. On
becoming Lord High Treasurer, the rent-rolls of the Exchequer lay
under his hand, and these were manipulated with clerkly art. An
insertion in them in 1618 correlates with the period of Balfour’s
inquiry. It casually records that Lord Chichester is owner of the
Bann and Lough Neagh, although everyone knew that the river had
been granted to the Londoners in 1610—apart from the “surrender” by
the ex-Deputy in 1611. The entry seemed quite business-like, and
reads:—“Arthur, Lord Chichester, assignee of James Hamilton, knight,
holds the entire fishery of the lake called Lough Neagh, and the
river Bann—per annum 12s. 6d.” A casual scribe might have ledgered
it; yet the words amounted to a royal recognition of his title. No
earlier Crown rent-roll contains such a record, and it was made seven
years after the Bann had been awarded to the Londoners, by Charter,
rent free.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account