The great fraud of UlsterHealy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
History
The great fraud of Ulster
Healy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
Ireland -- History -- 17th century; Ulster (Northern Ireland and Ireland) -- History
Again Felim resorted to London, and again a fresh Commission was
issued to do him right. The new Commissioners, on the 17th December,
1617, confirmed O’Byrne’s title, but with dogged tenacity Graham
got St. John to appoint judges to re-hear the dispute. The struggle
seemed unending, and although evidence was taken afresh by the
judges they dared not announce a conclusion either way. On the 23rd
January, 1618, St. John transmitted their notes to London and asked
for directions. Delay and expense provoked a compromise, and Felim by
a new order was restored to three-fourths of his lands, but Graham’s
piety in purveying a brace of churches for Cosha was rewarded by
one-fourth. To leave O’Byrne insecure, no fresh Patent was issued to
him; and soon afterwards Lord Falkland became Deputy.
Parsons was now promoted head of the Court of Wards and
Receiver-General, but he remained as of yore a-swoop for prey.
The plot against the O’Byrnes was revived. Felim, being the only
Chief left in Erin, was treated as a blot on the landscape, and in
1622 Falkland reported him to the Privy Council as an ill-disposed
person. He owned too big a property to be allowed to remain in his
mountains undisturbed. The reply to the Deputy from England, however,
discouraged attack. The “Spanish marriage” was at that moment being
negotiated by Buckingham, and Falkland learnt that, if the heir to
the throne were to wed a Catholic, a fresh persecution of his bride’s
co-religionists might appear untimely. When the match with Spain was
broken off in 1623 he took a freer hand.
On the 27th August, 1624, he authorised Parsons to hold a Commission
to examine O’Byrne’s title, as if it were a new problem troubling the
sages of the law. The Surveyor-General held “office,” and returned
a finding that Felim’s estate had been forfeited by his father’s
rebellion and death—ignoring both grants and pardons from King James
and Queen Elizabeth. Falkland, ablaze for law and order, wrote to
the Privy Council on the 25th March, 1625, asking them to consider
“how vain a thing it is to suppose to content Felim and his sons
by indulgently suspending the taking of the lands in his country.”
The English authorities gave this presentation of the equities no
countenance, and King James, in one of the last dispatches before
his death (March, 1625), begged Falkland “to maintain inviolable the
credit of his great office.”
Yet Charles I. was not a year on the Throne when the Deputy engaged
himself in a still more cruel plot to uproot the O’Byrnes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account