The great fraud of UlsterHealy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
History
The great fraud of Ulster
Healy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
Ireland -- History -- 17th century; Ulster (Northern Ireland and Ireland) -- History
Sir Arthur Chichester was at that time Governor of Carrickfergus, and
his garrison there furnished the soldiers who massacred his Catholic
tenants (with their women and children) by night in Island Magee.
Whether this bloody business preceded the insurrection of 1641 and
provoked it, or was a reprisal following thereon, is a moot point
between the partisans of the Planters and those of the expelled
natives. The first attempt at its “history” by Chichester’s muse laid
the blame on Scottish regiments. It was soon proved that no Scotch
soldiers landed in Ulster till after January, 1642, the date assigned
for the crime by the Settlers. “January” was too hurriedly chosen by
the apologists for slaughter, and this, perhaps, because the Governor
of Carrickfergus would have been able to show that he was then
somewhere else.
When the time of the arrival of the Scotch regiments was established
it was too late to change “January” to another month. Sir Arthur
himself remained mute. He offered no defence or explanation for the
crime, nor announced that any of the garrison were punished, or even
admonished. As to whether he was a man capable of perverting dates or
inspiring falsehoods his conduct in other fields of enterprise may
assist to a conclusion. One test of his character in this respect is
supplied by the documents and statements he put forward to regain the
fisheries when kingly power was re-established. If he made a false
case concerning the title to real estate he may well have devised
excuses to escape the blame of blood-guiltiness for the killing of
his serfs.
Whenever massacre benefited the Planters enough murderers always
survived to inspire pamphleteers and historians with their version
of the “facts.” Native imitators generally ended their activities on
the gallows, and their epitaphs are framed by their executioners.
In tracing such incidents of conquest—from Gaul to Mexico—it is
inevitable that the earliest and best opportunities for penmanship
and “impression” should be always enjoyed by the triumphant faction.
That the rebellion of 1641 entailed sufferings on many Planters as
severe as those endured by the natives whom they had driven out a
generation earlier is beyond question. As the movement spread, the
clansmen of the O’Neills, O’Dohertys, O’Cahans, O’Donnells, and
Maguires retook their patrimonies, and again ate fish on Fridays
without paying toll to strangers. The South then took fire, and
England, having her own rebellion on hand, lost control over the
greater part of Ireland for a dozen years.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account