The great fraud of UlsterHealy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
History
The great fraud of Ulster
Healy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
Ireland -- History -- 17th century; Ulster (Northern Ireland and Ireland) -- History
When the lease was enrolled the gang grew alarmed. Clotworthy,
therefore, got Henry Cromwell to apply to his father’s secretary in
London, John Thurloe, to cloak the fraud. In December, 1656, Henry
implored Thurloe to obtain from his father a fresh Signet Letter
sanctioning a grant which would include the Bann. Thurloe ignored
his supplications, and thus the hypocrites were left in the plight of
men who, to rob the City of London, had betrayed their master.
The Commonwealth Charter, which restored the estate of the
Corporation, including the Bann, was issued three months later, and
thus two repugnant grants came into existence. The Dublin junta kept
their secret to themselves. Thurloe also held his peace, and in the
following year Cromwell died. Thurloe, however, carefully preserved
the correspondence, and after the Restoration hid it behind the
ceiling of a garret in his chambers at Lincoln’s Inn, with other
Cromwellian literature. There it was found fifty years later—embalmed
in the odour of sanctity.
Cromwell’s death soon led to a flood of intrigue among his
Anglo-Irish retainers. Each was intent on asserting one great
principle—how best to hold on to the spoil with which confiscation
had endowed them. If Republicanism would secure this, they were
Republicans. If possession must be tempered by monarchy—then “Long
live Charles II.”
CHAPTER XXI.
REBELLION REWARDED.
The Irish Republicans quickly came to the conclusion that monarchical
principles possessed a virtue which afforded the best guarantee for
their interests. Their budding royalism was threatened with blight
from one quarter only—the exiled Irish soldiers who had fought for
Prince Charles at home and abroad. These unreasonables had to be
reckoned with, for Gaelic swordsmen, gentle and simple, formed part
of his bodyguard and influenced his decisions. He even sympathised
with their religion while his exile lasted, for the Duke of Ormonde
relates that he once found his Majesty secretly hearing Mass in
Brussels in a fit of lonely piety.
The Cromwellians, awake to these difficulties, and ready to jettison
any inconvenient doctrines which blocked their way, held a Convention
in Dublin in 1659-60, to debate “the situation.” First they seized
Dublin Castle from the weaklings who represented the tottering
Commonwealth, and next they imprisoned all Catholic loyalists who
could be laid hands on, to prevent their having any credit in
bringing back the King or earning his gratitude. Then they sent an
embassy to Brussels to propose conditions to his Majesty. Sir Arthur
Forbes (son of the “discoverer” of 1628) was their messenger, and on
his return Forbes reported hopefully to their spokesmen, Sir Charles
Coote and Lord Broghill (Boyle). On the 16th March, 1660, the exiled
King wrote engaging that “whatever Coote should promise and undertake
on his behalf (which it was in his power to perform) he would make
good.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account