The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power to National AdvantageAngell, Norman
History
The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power to National Advantage
Angell, Norman
Commercial policy; Disarmament; Imperialism; War; War, Cost of
(6) The fundamental causes of this war are economic in the
narrower, as well as in the larger sense of the term; in the
first because conquest was the Turk's only trade--he desired to
live out of taxes wrung from a conquered people, to exploit
them as a means of livelihood, and this conception was at the
root of most of Turkish misgovernment. And in the larger sense
its cause is economic because in the Balkans, remote
geographically from the main drift of European economic
development, there has not grown up that interdependent social
life, the innumerable contacts which in the rest of Europe have
done so much to attenuate primitive religious and racial
hatreds.
(7) A better understanding by the Turk of the real nature of
civilized government, of the economic futility of conquest, of
the fact that a means of livelihood (an economic system) based
upon having more force than someone else and using it
ruthlessly against him is an impossible form of human
relationship bound to break down, _would_ have kept the peace.
(8) If European statecraft had not been animated by false
conceptions, largely economic in origin, based upon a belief in
the necessary rivalry of states, the advantages of preponderant
force and conquest, the Western nations could have composed
their quarrels and ended the abominations of the Balkan
peninsula long ago--even in the opinion of the _Times_. And it
is our own false statecraft--that of Great Britain--which has a
large part of the responsibility for this failure of European
civilization. It has caused us to sustain the Turk in Europe,
to fight a great and popular war with that aim, and led us into
treaties which, had they been kept, would have obliged us to
fight to-day on the side of the Turk against the Balkan States.
(9) If by "theories" and "logic" is meant the discussion of and
interest in principles, the ideas that govern human
relationship, they are the only things that can prevent future
wars, just as they were the only things that brought religious
wars to an end--a preponderant power "imposing" peace playing
no rôle therein. Just as it was false religious theories which
made the religious wars, so it is false political theories
which make the political wars.
(10) War is only inevitable in the sense that other forms of
error and passion--religious persecution for instance--are
inevitable; they cease with better understanding, as the
attempt to impose religious belief by force has ceased in
Europe.
(11) We should not prepare for war; we should prepare to
prevent war; and though that preparation may include
battleships and conscription, those elements will quite
obviously make the tension and danger greater unless there is
also a better European opinion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account