The great Persian War and its preliminaries : $b A study of the evidence, literary and topographicalGrundy, G. B. (George Beardoe)
History
The great Persian War and its preliminaries : $b A study of the evidence, literary and topographical
Grundy, G. B. (George Beardoe)
Greece -- History -- Persian Wars, 500-449 B.C.
Long before Xerxes had arrived at Therma the question of the defence
of Hellas had been the subject of anxious consideration and of violent
discussion among the Greek States. It is perhaps impossible to realize
to its fulness the alarm which the reported advance of the great
expedition created throughout the Hellenic world in Europe. The great
monarchy which some sixty years before had reached the Ægean; the
great power which for more than a generation past had filled the whole
eastern horizon of the Greek; the power which had subdued Asia, even
beyond the limits of the known world, and had conquered lands unknown,
whose terrors would certainly not be diminished in the myth and fable
of those who knew them not, was now advancing upon their own homeland.
The lack of unity at home, too, must have served greatly to increase
the anxiety of the situation. New combinations had to be formed, to be
sought; old enmities to be laid aside, for a while, at any rate; old
enemies to be reconciled, before anything resembling a united front
could be shown to the great Eastern power which was now putting forth
all its strength against them.
In most respects everything had to be done in a hurry.
It had not been possible for those who knew what had been going on for
some years past beyond the Ægean to rouse into action the lethargy
of the self-centred life of the barrier-bound states of Greece. One
phase of the situation was of peculiar irony. Athens, the state
which seems to have seen most clearly the coming storm, and to have
rightly apprehended its tremendous nature, had herself, consciously or
unconsciously, created a myth peculiarly calculated to lull the more
ignorant population of the country into a false sense of security. The
tale of Marathon was less than ten years old; but under the fostering
care of its parent, it had grown immensely during that period, and done
great credit throughout Greece to those who were responsible for its
origin and nurture. #APATHY OF THE GREEKS.# Its growth had been
unimpeded by the deadly enemy of young and promising myths, independent
evidence; for, owing to the fact that the Athenians had been
practically alone at Marathon, this can hardly be said to have existed;
and the history of the fight was only limited by the powers of its
creators. The myth had done its work: it had raised the reputation of
Athens in Greece generally to a great height, in singular, and, to the
Athenians, in pleasing contrast to the relative obscurity of the past.
But it had done more than this. It had, no doubt, created an impression
in the Greek mind generally that the great power of Persia was not so
great as had been imagined, if an army not by any means accounted the
best in Greece could inflict on it a blow supposed to be so crushing as
Marathon. To Athens alone was the falsity of this impression known; and
yet, even in the face of this great danger, whose greatness she also
could alone adequately gauge, she could not afford to dispel it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account