The great Persian War and its preliminaries : $b A study of the evidence, literary and topographicalGrundy, G. B. (George Beardoe)
History
The great Persian War and its preliminaries : $b A study of the evidence, literary and topographical
Grundy, G. B. (George Beardoe)
Greece -- History -- Persian Wars, 500-449 B.C.
Despite this appeal on the part of the Aleuadæ, the Thessalians as
a body had at first no intention to medize. They disapproved of the
action of this family; and, before the Persians had crossed the
Hellespont, they sent a strongly worded appeal to the council of the
Greeks assembled at the Isthmus to help them with a large force to
defend the passage of Olympus: otherwise, they said, they must of
necessity yield to the barbarian.
The appeal did not remain without its effect. The Greeks determined
to send an army to guard the Vale of Tempe. Ten thousand heavy-armed
troops were despatched by sea up the Euripus, and, after landing at
Halos on the west shore of the Pagasætic Gulf, marched to Tempe.[101]
The despatching of these troops by sea has been taken to indicate that
the Greeks mistrusted the attitude of the Bœotians. It is, perhaps,
possible to attach too much importance to the symbolical submission
of the Northern States of Greece. The general course of events would
seem to indicate that one of two things was the case at this time. It
may have been that the heralds had not yet visited these States to
receive their submission when the expedition to Tempe took place—a
quite possible contingency when it is borne in mind that these events
are dated by Herodotus as occurring at a time when the Persian had not
yet crossed into Europe, whereas the heralds did not meet Xerxes until
he got to Therma. Or it may have been that, if such submission had been
made, it had been made with the mental reservation of the intention to
take part with the rest of Greece, provided the Southern States showed
a disposition to strike a blow in defence of the North.[102]
#EXPEDITION TO THESSALY.#
The Bœotian attitude at the time of Thermopylæ, as related by
Herodotus, is so extraordinary as to be incredible; and his
account of the attitude of these Northern States at this time suggests
the suspicion that the bitterness of feeling against them, which
undoubtedly existed after Platæa, has been antedated by him, and has
led to the growth of a story discreditable to them, relating to the
time immediately previous to the actual invasion. It is not difficult
to see that the Greek States of the South, by the selfishness of their
policy, made it necessary for the States of the North to seek their own
salvation by an attitude which, though on the face of it unpatriotic,
was forced on them by the situation.
Such is the conclusion which may be drawn from Herodotus’ narrative of
the events of this period. It is a tale undoubtedly coloured by
the bitterness of the feeling subsequently displayed to those Greeks
who were represented as having betrayed the Greek national cause. It
may be, after all, that the account of the matter in Diodorus, which
is more explicit, is also more true. If he is to be believed, neither
Locris nor Bœotia nor the Thessalians proper medized until the retreat
from Tempe left North Greece deserted for the time being.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account