The great Persian War and its preliminaries : $b A study of the evidence, literary and topographicalGrundy, G. B. (George Beardoe)
History
The great Persian War and its preliminaries : $b A study of the evidence, literary and topographical
Grundy, G. B. (George Beardoe)
Greece -- History -- Persian Wars, 500-449 B.C.
The authorities at Delphi seem to have read the coming invasion in the
light of a tremendous punitive expedition against Athens, a revenge
for Marathon and Sardes. ◆H. vii. 138.◆ It has already been shown
on the evidence of Herodotus that these were the declared reasons
of the expedition. Believing this to be the case, it required no
great imaginative powers with respect to the future to foretell the
destruction of Attica. Hence the first of the two celebrated oracles
which caused the Athenian delegates such natural alarm. The Athenians
are told to fly to the ends of the earth, and the utter destruction of
their Greek home is foretold.
It was to Athens alone that such advice was given. Athens was the
object of the expedition, so Delphi thought; and if the object
were removed, the invasion might never take place. In any case, if
it did take place, it was possible that its object might be regarded
as attained if Attica and Athens were laid waste; and therefore it
was necessary, in consistency with this view, to discourage the
interference of the Greek States in the matter. ◆H. vii 148.◆ This is
the reason for the advice given to Argos and to the Cretans. ◆H. vii.
169.◆ If other States interfered the devastation might spread to the
whole of Greece.
It is quite conceivable that Delphi regarded this as being, under the
circumstances, the most patriotic policy which could be advocated. The
removal of the cause of offence would go far towards expiating the
offence itself. Such a course of action was in a way parallel to that
demanded by one Greek State from another in a case of sacrilegious
pollution.
Two questions now arise. In the first place, at what period in the
development of affairs prior to the invasion was this oracular response
delivered to the Athenians? Secondly, what interval elapsed between
it and the second? The first question hardly admits of an answer. The
wording of the oracle affords but a slender and uncertain clue; and
that, such as it is, is contained in the latter half of it. The answer,
as given in Herodotus, is in twelve lines of verse. ◆H. vii. 140.◆
Of these the first six refer to Athens alone. The last six, however,
extend the threat of destruction to other States of Greece. And yet
the inhabitants of those States are not advised to fly their land; the
exhortation to flight is addressed to Athens alone. If these words were
dictated by circumstances existent at the time they were spoken, they
can only be of the nature of a threat addressed to the other powers
of Greece; and, if so, they were probably uttered either during the
expedition to Tempe, or immediately after it, and were a warning of
what would happen to those who tried to resist the invader.
A further possibility is that the last six lines appeared in a revised
version of the original, made after the event.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account