The great Persian War and its preliminaries : $b A study of the evidence, literary and topographicalGrundy, G. B. (George Beardoe)
History
The great Persian War and its preliminaries : $b A study of the evidence, literary and topographical
Grundy, G. B. (George Beardoe)
Greece -- History -- Persian Wars, 500-449 B.C.
The first oracle seems to have been an expression of the policy which
Delphi was disposed to advocate in view of the coming invasion. This
policy can only have been founded on the genuine belief that Athens
was the sole object aimed at by the Persians, and could remain so,
if the rest of the Greek States would abstain from interference. The
best solution of the situation seemed to be the voluntary removal of
the Athenians to a land outside Hellas. If this was not the policy of
Delphi, her advice to the Cretans, and, above all, to Argos, is quite
inexplicable.
But whatever Delphi thought, there was a very general opinion
throughout Greece, and especially in Peloponnesus, that the coming
invasion did not aim merely at the punishment of Athens, but at the
reduction of Greece to the position of a satrapy of the Persian
Empire. It was known, too, at this time that the invading force was,
perhaps, relatively stronger on sea than on land. It is not difficult,
therefore, to imagine the blank dismay with which the Peloponnesian
States must have heard of the wording of the first of the two oracles
addressed to Athens, and no time can have been lost in setting
their representatives at Delphi to undo the baneful effect which
the pronouncement must have on the Athenian decision. Peloponnesus
intended, no doubt, to defend itself at the Isthmus; but the Spartans
had a perfectly clear comprehension of the necessary part which the
Greek fleet, of which the Athenians must furnish the most important
contingent, must play in the defence.
It is unnecessary to suppose that the pressure was exerted on the
oracle at the immediate initiative of persons who were present on the
spot when the Athenian delegates were given the first answer.
Herodotus is not strict on questions of chronology; possibly his
sources of information did not allow him to be so; and the interval
between the two oracles may have been quite considerable relative to
the rapid march of events. Meanwhile pressure had been brought to bear
on the authorities at Delphi from Peloponnesus, a part of the world
whose representations they could not afford to neglect. So the tone
of the first response was modified in the Peloponnesian interest. The
Athenian was still counselled to desert Attica, but not to seek safety
away from Greece; and the fleet is clearly pointed to as the means of
salvation.
It was not Salamis which Delphi foresaw. It may be doubted even whether
she had any belief in the policy advocated. The Isthmus and the
Peloponnesians demanded the Athenian fleet; and Delphi could not afford
to quarrel with her best friends.
The new oracle, whose meaning was obscured by the fact that the
previous one had been uttered, came near to being misinterpreted by
those to whom it was sent. They evidently saw from the first that it
was, in a sense, a reversal of its predecessor; but as to its positive
meaning they were in much doubt.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account