The great Persian War and its preliminaries : $b A study of the evidence, literary and topographicalGrundy, G. B. (George Beardoe)
History
The great Persian War and its preliminaries : $b A study of the evidence, literary and topographical
Grundy, G. B. (George Beardoe)
Greece -- History -- Persian Wars, 500-449 B.C.
It is quite easy to see that there prevailed in antiquity
two views as to the exact significance of the coincidence of the
Carthaginian attack on Sicily with the invasion of Greece by Xerxes.
Herodotus never saw any connection between them. It is possible that
no hint of such a connection was apparent in the sources from which
he drew his story of the relations between Gelo and the embassy. ◆H.
vii 158.◆ He represents the former as being willing to send a very
considerable contingent to aid the Greeks at home, provided that the
latter will give him the command of the united force. The condition, if
the offer was ever made, was in no wise a surprising one. Considering
the magnitude of the help which Gelo is reported to have offered, it
was reasonable. ◆H. vii 159.◆ And yet it was refused, and that, too,
in language which cannot be regarded as otherwise than insulting. So
Gelo reduced his terms to the command of either the sea or land force.
And now the Athenian section of the embassy had a word to say. Their
refusal of the command by sea was, perhaps, somewhat more polite, but
hardly less explicit than had been that of the Spartans to the original
condition. Gelo’s answer, as reported, is brief, but marked by a wit
not unworthy of the distinguished literary society of his court: “My
Athenian friend, you seem to have commanders, without the likelihood of
any troops to command.”
After this, it may well be imagined, there was nothing more to be said
or done, and the embassy went home.
Gelo, however, is reported to have sent a treasure-ship to Delphi, to
watch the course of the war, with orders, in case the Persian won the
day, to surrender the treasure to him and offer the earth and water of
submission. The general origin of the tale so far is plainly indicated
by Herodotus. It is a story which existed—perhaps indeed was current—in
European Greece, for the historian, before proceeding to add further
details, expressly mentions that they were derived from Sicily.
◆H. vii. 165.◆
The Sicilians say, so he relates, that in spite of what had
occurred, Gelo would have aided the Greeks and submitted to the
Lacedæmonian command, had not circumstances arisen at home, in the
shape of a Carthaginian invasion, which prevented him from so
doing. Herodotus ascribes the invasion to the intervention of the
Carthaginians in favour of Terillos, tyrant of Himera, who had been
driven out of his government by Thero of Akragas. An immense army,
300,000 in number, composed, after the manner of the Carthaginian
armies, of nearly all the peoples in the Western Mediterranean, invaded
Sicily by way of Himera.
Such is Herodotus’ account of the events in Sicily at this critical
time, an account which closes with words of great significance, which
put a somewhat different complexion on the tale of the sending of the
treasure-ship to Delphi “Thus, not being able to help the Greeks (owing
to this invasion), Gelo sent the treasure to Delphi.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account