The great Persian War and its preliminaries : $b A study of the evidence, literary and topographicalGrundy, G. B. (George Beardoe)
History
The great Persian War and its preliminaries : $b A study of the evidence, literary and topographical
Grundy, G. B. (George Beardoe)
Greece -- History -- Persian Wars, 500-449 B.C.
Xerxes, on arriving at the Malian plain, pitched his camp in Trachinia,
commanding the country as far as Trachis. The Persian encampment
would seem to have stretched from the river Melas, or thereabouts,
to the entrance of the west gate of the pass. The Greek encampment
was in the middle gate, probably behind the first mound, either on
the ridge beyond the valley, or on the stream _débris_ over which
the modern road passes. The numbers of the Greek army must have been
about eight thousand, including the unstated numbers of the Opuntian
Locrians. Of these, however, one thousand Phocians were set to guard
the path of the Anopæa, more than three thousand feet above the gate.
Leonidas was in command. ◆H. vii. 204.◆ Even before the battle
brought him undying fame he seems to have been a man whose character
excited great admiration. The three hundred men whom he took with him
from Sparta were the royal bodyguard, picked men all, and fathers of
families, so Herodotus says. The historian evidently implies that in
so desperate a venture Leonidas considered it unadvisable to take with
him men whose death would blot out their name from the land of the
living. Is this detail quite consistent with the presumed intention to
send reinforcements? It is possibly a graphic touch added by Spartan
tradition after the event.
The Theban contingent was four hundred in number. Herodotus’ account of
all relating to it is so full of disputable motives that it has been
suggested that he followed a tradition which developed either under the
influence of the bitterness of feeling called forth by the attitude of
Thebes later on in the war, or of the violent enmity which sprang up
between Athens and Thebes in after-time, and which was at its height
at the time when Herodotus wrote. He represents Leonidas as taking the
Thebans with him under a sort of compulsion, because he suspected them
of a tendency to medize. There are several reasons urged for doubting
this version of the story of the Theban participation in the campaign.
1. It is doubtful whether Leonidas with so small a force as he had
with him could have coerced so powerful a State as Thebes.
◆Diod. xi. 4.◆
2. Ephoros says these Thebans were of the party opposed to medism.
3. If they were not, Xerxes committed a gross error of policy in
branding their prisoners after Thermopylæ.
◆Plut. Herod. Mal. 31–33.◆
4. Plutarch, a Bœotian himself, emphatically denies the truth of
Herodotus’ story.
Plutarch’s statements, in brief, are as follows:—
(_a_.) The fact that Thebes sent five hundred men to Tempe is proof
that up to the time of Thermopylæ Thebes supported the Greek
cause.
(_b_.) Leonidas had no suspicions against Thebes. He was treated with
special honour there.
#THE THEBAN CONTINGENT.#
(_c_.) If these Thebans were traitors to the Greek cause, why did
Leonidas retain so dangerous an element with him in the last
fight at Thermopylæ?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account