The great Persian War and its preliminaries : $b A study of the evidence, literary and topographicalGrundy, G. B. (George Beardoe)
History
The great Persian War and its preliminaries : $b A study of the evidence, literary and topographical
Grundy, G. B. (George Beardoe)
Greece -- History -- Persian Wars, 500-449 B.C.
The sequel to this story is in all probability not unconnected with the
policy which led to the removal of the Pæonians to Asia. #THE LOWER
STRYMON.# It is evident that Herodotus had no idea of the reasons
which induced Darius to adopt a measure which, though not uncommon
in the previous history of the Eastern empires, was an unusual one
with him. The tale which he tells in order to account for it was
doubtless a commonplace among the stories of his time, and one which
was told in relation to more than one event in the history of the past.
It is unnecessary to reproduce it here, and still more unnecessary to
point out the inadequacy of the motive which it suggests.
The strategic importance of the country occupied by this people is
amply sufficient to account for the policy which Darius adopted with
regard to them. They commanded the short stretch of the Strymon river
between Lake Prasias[10] and the sea, and were thus in a position whose
natural strength was again and again demonstrated in later history, and
whose importance lay in the fact, already pointed out in the case of
Myrkinos, that it commanded not merely the trade-route north, but also
the great route westward from Eastern Thrace and the Hellespont region.
The substantial details in the account of the incident indicate that
it must have taken place during, not after, that conquest of the coast
districts of Thrace of which Herodotus has already spoken.
The story is told as follows:—
◆H. v. 14.◆
“Then Darius wrote letters to Megabazos, whom he had left in command
in Thrace, ordering him to remove the Pæonians from their homes,
and to bring them, their children and wives, to him. A horseman
immediately hurried off to the Hellespont bearing the message, and,
having crossed over, handed the despatch to Megabazos. After reading
it, Megabazos took guides from Thrace and marched against Pæonia.”
From the last detail it must be presumed that he had not as yet been
campaigning in the Pæonian region.
“The Pæonians, on hearing that the Persians were coming against them,
collected their forces on the side towards the sea; thinking that the
Persians would attempt the invasion at that point”
The Persians, however, turned the position by taking the inland road.
◆H. v. 16.◆
The Pæonians between Lake Praslas and the sea immediately surrendered
and were removed to Asia. Herodotus then adds that those about Mount
Pangæus were “not substantially” subdued by Megabazos.[11]
If this were indeed the case, it is evident that the assertion which
he has previously made to the effect that Megabazos reduced the “coast
districts” of Thrace must be understood in a restricted sense in so far
as this part of the country is concerned.
The net result of this part of the campaign seems to have been that
Megabazos got possession of the most critical point of the coast road.
◆H. v. 17.◆
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account