The Great Riots of New York, 1712 to 1873Headley, Joel Tyler
History
The Great Riots of New York, 1712 to 1873
Headley, Joel Tyler
Draft Riot, New York, N.Y., 1863; New York (N.Y.) -- History; Riots -- New York (State) -- New York
She found the ante-room filled with officials and other personages
on important business, waiting their turn to be admitted. But her
determined, earnest manner so impressed every one with the importance of
her mission, that precedence was granted her, and she found herself at
once beside the astonished Governor. Without any preliminaries, she
told him she had just come from the head of the church, and wanted
his excellency to visit him immediately. No business was of such vital
importance as this. The self-possessed Governor coolly replied that he
should be glad to see the Archbishop, but business was too pressing to
allow him to be absent even a half an hour from his duties. She hastened
back to Archbishop Hughes, and prevailed on him to write a note to
Governor Seymour, asking him to call and see him, as he was unable
to get out. Fortified with this, she now took a priest with her, and
providing herself with a carriage, returned to head-quarters, and
absolutely forced, by her energy and determination and persuasive
manner, the Governor to leave his business, and go to the Archbishop's.
The invitation to the Irish to meet him was the result of this
interview.
Why Archbishop Hughes took no more active part than he did in quelling
this insurrection, when there was scarcely a man in it except members of
his own flock, seems strange. It is true he had published an address
to them, urging them to keep the peace; but it was prefaced by a long,
undignified, and angry attack on Mr. Greeley, of the _Tribune_, and
showed that he was in sympathy with the rioters, at least in their
condemnation of the draft. The pretence that it would be unsafe for him
to pass through the streets, is absurd; for on three different occasions
common priests had mingled with the mob, not only with impunity, but
with good effect. He could not, therefore, have thought himself to be in
any great danger. One thing, at any rate, is evident: had an Irish mob
threatened to burn down a Roman Catholic church, or a Roman Catholic
orphan asylum, or threatened any of the institutions or property of the
Roman Church, he would have shown no such backwardness or fear. The
mob would have been confronted with the most terrible anathemas of the
church, and those lawless bands quailed before the maledictions of the
representative of "God's vicegerent on earth." It is unjust to suppose
that he wished this plunder and robbery to continue, or desired to
see Irishmen shot down in the streets; it must, therefore, be left to
conjecture, why he could not be moved to any interference except by
outside pressure, and then show so much lukewarmness in his manner--in
fact, condemning their opponents almost as much as themselves.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account