“Was he the cause of her death?” I asked gravely.
“The cause, sir,” he said, “and not the cause. She told it me all in
the hospital where she lay. She’d sent for me while she could speak. I
was the only one left to her, and she owed it to me, she thought. She
was frightened of him, sir--and why?--why was she frightened of him?”
“Well?”
“_Because he’d just taken her mistress’s baby away to a woman called
Carey, and had it killed._”
There--it was out. I was in possession of the secret which “Mark” had
dared this invertebrate witness to reveal. The poor fellow entreated
me not to turn his confession to his ruin.
“He didn’t kill _her_, you know,” he said, in desperate extenuation.
“She just jumped out of the cab, when she found it was dead, and was
run over. There was a fog at the time.”
The fog, I thought, was lifting.
“Mr Churton,” I said, “so Luck favour us, you shall never see or hear
from me again.”
CHAPTER XVIII.
TELEGRAMS
Now, henceforth, I was to move on with a set and deadly purpose.
Murder was in the air, and I was stalking it, a hooded falcon on my
wrist. Though I knew only what the reader knows, I had the feeling
that, were I once to loose the jess, some strange and unexpected
quarry would be brought down from the skies. Mark is a significant
name to the beasts of chase. In the meantime, awaiting the psychologic
moment, I had reason to reflect that there is generally somewhere that
flaw in the boldest criminal calculations which sooner or later will
give the crime away. The wicked astute man thinks astuteness
impossible to virtue--one of those mistakes of generalising which lead
to accidents. He estimates _all_ goodness at credulity, _all_ vice at
subtlety. Yet both Solomon and Sancho Panza were good men. Now, if for
twenty years Mr Churton’s mouth had remained sealed from terror, why
should that terror become suddenly inoperative in the twenty-first
year? It is just the contempt for providing against such unforeseen
contingencies which constitutes the flaws. But it would have been
quite possible to close Mr Churton’s mouth at once and for ever at the
beginning of things. Casual concessions to humanity are the weaknesses
of all but Napoleonic criminals. Mr Dalston, then, it would appear,
was not a Napoleonic criminal. He attached too much value, perhaps, to
the mere terror of his personality.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account