The Great Steel Strike and its LessonsFoster, William Z.
History
The Great Steel Strike and its Lessons
Foster, William Z.
Steel Strike, U.S., 1919-1920; United States Steel Corporation
2. Regarding the alleged non-participation of Americans in the movement:
Although in many districts where the strike was practically 100 per
cent. effective, the Americans struck almost to a man with the other
workers and fought gamely to the finish, nevertheless it must be
admitted that in the main, when compared with the foreigners,[19] they
made a poor showing. To begin with they organized slowly; then they
struck reluctantly and scatteringly; and finally, they showed little
tenacity as strikers. But this general sluggishness originated, however,
not in patriotic objections to the movement or lack of sympathy with its
aims; but chiefly because the Americans, as skilled workers, were
naturally slower and less determined in action than the foreigners, or
unskilled workers.
In the steel industry the most skilled men are to be found in those
trades actually engaged in the making and rolling of iron and
steel--the melters, puddlers, shearmen, rollers, roughers, heaters,
Bessemer blowers, etc. These men are paid upon a tonnage basis and
generally receive considerably higher wages than the mechanical
tradesmen--bricklayers, machinists, boilermakers, riggers, firemen,
engineers, electrical workers, blacksmiths, etc., who build, maintain
and generally operate the plants. It is among the favored tonnage
trades that the Americans are especially intrenched.
In the old days these highly skilled workers took the initiative in the
struggle for human rights in the steel industry--the mechanical trades
and unskilled workers playing a very minor part. Homestead was one of
their great battles, only 752 of the 3800 men employed being union
members in good-standing. They were then bold, militant and tenacious as
bull dogs. But since those times they have been defeated so often, due
to a weakening of their proportional strength and strategical position,
that they have lost much of the independent spirit which once
characterized them. They now fear the power of the Steel Trust; they
dread its pitiless blacklist; they hesitate to put in jeopardy their
comparatively good jobs, which they secured only after long years of
service in minor positions, and which, once lost, are so hard to regain.
They want better conditions now as much as they ever did, but they lack
the self-confidence to fight for them. All through the campaign their
attitude, barring the exceptions here and there, was to wait until the
lesser skilled men had so far perfected the organization as to make it
seem safe for them to join it. When the strike came the unskilled
workers led the way; then came the mechanical trades; with the
aristocratic steel workers bringing up the rear. But in scurrying back
to scab in the mills, the order was just the reverse. This was the
experience in virtually every section of the industry.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account