"The Greatest Failure in All History": A Critical Examination of the Actual Workings of Bolshevism in RussiaSpargo, John
History
"The Greatest Failure in All History": A Critical Examination of the Actual Workings of Bolshevism in Russia
Spargo, John
Communism -- Russia
I cannot too strongly insist upon the altogether unanimous
idealism of those early days. There was not an ugly streak
in that beautiful dawn where now the skies are glowering and
red and frightful. I say that output was speeded up. I, as
chairman of the first Soviet,[27] assure you that we received
fifty-seven papers from workmen containing proposals for
increasing the efficiency of the factory; and that spirit
lasted three months, figures of output went well up and old
closed-down factories were reopened. _New Russia was bursting
with energy--the sluice-gates of our character were unlocked._
[27] That is, “first Soviet” at the Lisvinsk factory, about seventy
miles from Perm.
There must have been a great deal of that exalted feeling among the
intelligent working-men of Russia in those stirring times. No one who
has known anything of the spiritual passion, of sacrificial quality,
which has characterized the Russian revolutionary movement can doubt
this. Of course, Jandarmov is referring to the early months before
Bolshevism began to spread in that district. Then there was a change.
It was the old, old story of rapidly declining production:
But after the first few months the workers as a whole began to
fall under the spell of catchwords and stock phrases. Agitation
began among the lower workers. Bolshevism started in the ranks
of unskilled labor. They clamored for the reduction of hours
and down went the output. The defenders of the idea of the
shortest possible working-day were the same men who afterward
turned out very fiends of Bolshevism and every disorder. I
watched the growing of their madness and the development of
their claims, each more impossible than the last.
In the Kiselovski mines the output of 2,000,000 poods monthly
dropped to 300,000, and the foundries of Upper Serginski
produced 1,200 poods of iron instead of 2,000. Why such a fall?
The engineers wondered how workers could reduce output to such
an extent if they tried, but one soon ceased to wonder at the
disasters that followed in quick succession.
There was anarchy in the factories and a premium on idleness
became the order of the day. It was a positive danger to work
more than the laziest unskilled laborer, because this was the
type of man who always seemed to get to the top of the Soviet.
“Traitor to the interests of Labor” you were called if you
exceeded the time limit, which soon became two hours a day.[28]
[28] These extracts are from a personal report by Jandarmov, sent to
the present writer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account