"The Greatest Failure in All History": A Critical Examination of the Actual Workings of Bolshevism in RussiaSpargo, John
History
"The Greatest Failure in All History": A Critical Examination of the Actual Workings of Bolshevism in Russia
Spargo, John
Communism -- Russia
Many unions were suppressed altogether. This happened to the Teachers’
Union, which was declared to be “counter-revolutionary.”[47] It
happened also to the Printers’ Union. In this case the authorities
simply declared that all membership cards were invalid and that
the old officers were displaced. In order to work as a printer it
was necessary to get a new card of membership, and such cards were
only issued to those who signed declarations of loyalty to the
Bolshevist authority.[48] The trades-unions were made to conform to
the decisions of the Communist Party and subordinated to the rule of
the Commissaries. Upon this point there is a good deal of evidence
available, though most of it comes from non-Bolshevist sources. The
references to this important matter in the official Bolshevist press
are very meager and vague, and the Ransomes, Goodes, Malones, Coppings,
and other apologists are practically silent upon the subject.
[47] See Keeling, _op. cit._
[48] _Idem._
The Socialist and trades-union leader, Oupovalov, from whom we have
previously quoted, testifies that “Trades-unions, as working-class
organizations independent of any political party, were transformed
by the Bolsheviki into party organizations and subordinated to the
Commissaries.” Strumillo, equally competent as a witness, says:
“Another claim of the Social Democrats--that trades-unions should be
independent of political parties--likewise came to nothing. They were
all to be under the control of the Bolsheviki. Alone the All-Russian
Union of Printers succeeded in keeping its independence, _but
eventually for that it was dispersed by the order of Lenin, and the
members of its Executive Committee arrested_.” These statements are
borne out by the testimony of the English trades-unionist, Keeling, who
says:
If a trades-union did not please the higher Soviet it was fined
and suppressed and a new union was formed in its place by the
Bolsheviks themselves. Entry to this new union was only open to
members of the old union who signed a form declaring themselves
entirely in agreement with, and prepared completely to support
in every detail, the policy of the Soviet Government.
Refusal to join on these terms meant the loss of the work
and the salary, together with exclusion from both the first
and second categories.[49] It will readily be understood how
serious a matter it was to oppose any coercive measure.
[49] _I.e._, the food categories entitling one to the highest and next
highest food rations.
Every incentive was held out to the poorer people to spy and
report on the others. A workman or a girl who gave information
that any member of the trades-union was opposed in any way to
the Soviet system was specially rewarded. He or she would be
given extra food and promoted as soon as possible to a seat
upon the executive of the union or a place on the factory
committee.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account