"The Greatest Failure in All History": A Critical Examination of the Actual Workings of Bolshevism in RussiaSpargo, John
History
"The Greatest Failure in All History": A Critical Examination of the Actual Workings of Bolshevism in Russia
Spargo, John
Communism -- Russia
If in capitalistic society a shortage of labor power marks the
most intensive activity of industry, in our own case this has
been caused by conditions which are unique and unprecedented in
capitalist economic experience. Only part of our industry is at
work, and yet there is a shortage of labor power felt in the
cities and industrial centers. We observe an exodus of laborers
from industrial centers, caused by poor living conditions.
Those hundreds of skilled laborers whom we are at present
lacking for the most elementary and minimal requirements of
industry have gone partly to the country, to labor communes,
Soviet farms, producers’ associations, while another part, a
very considerable one, serves in the army. _But the proletariat
also leaks away to join the ranks of petty profiteers and
barter-traders, we are ashamed and sorry to confess._ This fact
is being observed and there is no use concealing or denying
it. There is also another cause which hurts the industrial
life and hinders a systematic organization of work. This is
the migration of the workers from place to place in search of
better living conditions. All of this, again, is the result of
the one fundamental cause--the very critical food situation in
the cities and, in general, the hard conditions of life for the
industrial proletariat.
Finally, some attention must be given to the speech of Lenin, reported
in _Izvestia_, January 29, 1920. Discussing the question whether
industry should be administered by a “collegium” or by a single
individual clothed with absolute authority, Lenin defended the latter
as the only practical method, illustrating his case by reference to
the Red Army. The Soviet organization in the army was well enough at
first, as a start, but the system of administration has now become
“administration by a single individual as the only proper method of
work.” He explains this point in the following words:
Administration by “colleges” as the basic type of the
organization of the Soviet administration presents in itself
something fundamental and necessary for the first stage when it
is necessary to build anew. But with the establishing of more
stable forms, a transition to practical work is bound up with
administration by a single individual, a system which, most of
all, assures the best use of human powers and a real and not
verbal control of work.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account