"The Greatest Failure in All History": A Critical Examination of the Actual Workings of Bolshevism in RussiaSpargo, John
History
"The Greatest Failure in All History": A Critical Examination of the Actual Workings of Bolshevism in Russia
Spargo, John
Communism -- Russia
To present Lenin’s change of front fairly it is necessary to quote at
considerable length from his two speeches at the Congress as reported
in _Pravda_, April 5 and 9, 1919:
During the long period of the bourgeois rule the peasant
has always supported the bourgeois authority and was on
the side of the bourgeoisie. This is understandable if one
takes into account the economic strength of the bourgeoisie
and the political methods of its rule. We cannot expect the
middle peasant to come over to our side immediately. But
if we direct our policy correctly, then after a certain
period hesitation will cease and the peasant may come over
to our side. Engels, who, together with Marx, laid the
foundations of scientific Marxism--that is, of the doctrine
which our party follows constantly and particularly in time
of revolution--Engels already established the fact that the
peasantry is differentiated with respect to their land holdings
into small, middle, and large; and this differentiation for the
overwhelming majority of the European countries exists to-day.
Engels said, “Perhaps it will not be necessary to suppress by
force even the large peasantry in all places.” And no sensible
Socialist ever thought that we might ever apply violence to
the middle peasantry (the smaller peasantry is our friend).
This is what Engels said in 1894, a year before his death,
when the agrarian question was the burning question of the
day. This point of view shows us that truth which is sometimes
forgotten, though with which we have always theoretically been
in accord. With respect to landlords and capitalists our task
is complete expropriation. But we do not permit any violence
with respect to the middle peasant. Even with respect to the
rich peasant, we do not speak with the same determination as
with regard to the bourgeoisie, “Absolute expropriation of the
rich peasantry.” In our program this difference is emphasized.
We say, “The suppression of the resistance of the peasantry,
the suppression of its counter-revolutionary tendencies.” This
is not complete expropriation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account